Stoek wrote:
A general rule of thumb is never speak in more than a complete sentence or at most a paragraph without giving the other person a chance for a verbal sign that they are genuinely interested in what your saying.
In the NT world, for general conversation THIS. 1+
For a lecture or talk, I was told 15 mins in a classroom setting. Then you should have some sort of "ear break".
Fior got in so much trouble at work for not knowing how to converse and doing the National Public Radio monologue. It doesn't help he talks in a montone, and makes him sound condescending.
I've timed Fior, he can talk MINIMUM 1 hour with no break, and something as mundane as
Person 1 "Weather's glorious today."
Fior "Well, it's because of the jet stream....."then 30 mins of off tangential rambles about weather solar flares and who knows what else.
Fior does the monologue because his social anxiety is so severe. He panics. He can't read body language. He tries to fill up the air with words, every minute detail so he won't be judged lacking. Conversation isn't like defending a thesis. The other person will ask questions if they are interested.
We've worked together on this issue. Now, if he is going into "detail mode", on what is considered small talk, I'll butt in and ask why he thinks I need to know that.
His monologues are now 10 mins long instead of an hour. He would literally ramble for an hour. People at parties would walk away, come back, walk away, or worse yet pick a fight because they thought he was being an arrogant ass.
If people are walking away or talking over you, check how long you spoke without stopping. I find 10 mins is the upper limit for anyone engaged in small, and not letting the other person chime in.
If you talk in a monotone, professor voice like Fior, it's even less.