Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

wreck1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2013
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 129

05 Aug 2013, 11:59 am

"As such, one person calibrated at 600 counterbalances the negativity of 10 million people below 200."
link here : http://happy-firewalker.blogspot.no/200 ... sness.html

Havent you heard about the world awakening wave yet? According to that article then 78% of humanity are destructive, harmful to themseelves and to others.



Cash__
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,381
Location: Missouri

05 Aug 2013, 4:43 pm

What kind of drugs is he taking?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 84
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Aug 2013, 4:56 pm

wreck1 wrote:
"As such, one person calibrated at 600 counterbalances the negativity of 10 million people below 200."
link here : http://happy-firewalker.blogspot.no/200 ... sness.html

Havent you heard about the world awakening wave yet? According to that article then 78% of humanity are destructive, harmful to themseelves and to others.


Can you translate this into the language of Sanity? Thank you.

ruveyn



wreck1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2013
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 129

06 Aug 2013, 11:59 am

You are rude. You are better off talking to yourself: "what kind of drug is he taking?"

I guess you go into the 78% of the world whom are destructive. When they talked about the prophet Muhammed they used to either say he was crazy or magician. Now you are appearently saying that I am crazy.

This is hawkins. A leading scientist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hawkins_(philosopher)



Exploronaut
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2012
Age: 24
Gender: Male
Posts: 177
Location: Norway

06 Aug 2013, 12:19 pm

wreck1 wrote:
You are rude. You are better off talking to yourself: "what kind of drug is he taking?"

I guess you go into the 78% of the world whom are destructive. When they talked about the prophet Muhammed they used to either say he was crazy or magician. Now you are appearently saying that I am crazy.

This is hawkins. A leading scientist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hawkins_(philosopher)

Quote:
David Hawkins


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to: navigation, search


David Hawkins may refer to:
David Hawkins (basketball) (born 1982), American basketball player
David Hawkins (defector) (born 1933), American youngest defector of the Korean War
David Hawkins (bishop) (born 1949), Bishop of Barking
David Hawkins (philosopher) (1913–2002), American professor and philosopher

Which one of them?


_________________
Reality is an illusion.


NewDawn
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 306
Location: Netherlands

06 Aug 2013, 12:31 pm

wreck1 wrote:
This is hawkins. A leading scientist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hawkins_(philosopher)


You're linking to the wrong David Hawkins. The man you are referring to in your OP is Dr. David R. Hawkins, psychiatrist. As you can see, WIkipedia doesn't have a lemma on him (I'm not surprised).

David Hawkins, the philosopher, worked in mathematics and mathematical philosophy. That's just about the antithesis of the rather vague stuff the other Hawkins is writing about.



wreck1
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2013
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 129

06 Aug 2013, 1:04 pm

OK sorry. But I like his theory.



Cash__
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,381
Location: Missouri

06 Aug 2013, 5:36 pm

wreck1 wrote:
You are rude. You are better off talking to yourself: "what kind of drug is he taking?"

I guess you go into the 78% of the world whom are destructive. When they talked about the prophet Muhammed they used to either say he was crazy or magician. Now you are appearently saying that I am crazy.

This is hawkins. A leading scientist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hawkins_(philosopher)


You posted it here expecting comments and discussion. It'd be naïve to only expect positive feedback.

I would say that the people who create and push crazy theories are the destructive ones.

I don't think Mohammed was crazy or a magician. I simply think he combined the religions that were popular where he lived at the time into a single religion and then sold it as a new revelation. And it worked, it did unify the people there.



Cash__
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2010
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,381
Location: Missouri

06 Aug 2013, 5:41 pm

wreck1 wrote:
OK sorry. But I like his theory.


If you like the consciousness theories, you may want to check out the Unity church that is mentioned in his blog. I live about 10 miles from their world headquarters. They are a church based upon those consciousness theories. You'd love their bookstore.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 21,127
Location: The 27th Path of Peh.

06 Aug 2013, 10:59 pm

Title looked interesting. Suppose I can still fall for a 'made you look!' occasionally.



nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,667
Location: KC area (born in NYC)

07 Aug 2013, 12:02 am

Cash__ wrote:
If you like the consciousness theories, you may want to check out the Unity church that is mentioned in his blog. I live about 10 miles from their world headquarters. They are a church based upon those consciousness theories. You'd love their bookstore.


Unity is Christian New Thought. A somewhat more faith-neutral form of New Thought is Centers for Spiritual Living (AKA Science of Mind).

Personally, I am not a fan of New Thought (a type of objective idealism), but I have studied it.


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (full-time, tenured sociology professor)
33 domains/23 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Internet Radio: http://www.markalanfoster.com