Page 2 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

DoodleDoo
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 347
Location: SoCal/Los Angeles

15 Feb 2014, 1:46 am

I do not believe a working solution will come from these big science projects it will come from somewhere unexpected. It might come in a few years, 200 years or maybe more. The Wright Brothers are an excellent example of this.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMLSrqYk0UE[/youtube]



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

15 Feb 2014, 6:25 am

ruveyn wrote:
Yodah says: Do not your breath hold until we controlled fusion have, else blue turn you will

controlled nuclear fusion is 30 years in the future where it has been since 1960 and will almost certainly be in 2043.

ruveyn


Maybe they're putting it off until gas and coal finally run out.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

15 Feb 2014, 10:38 am

Robdemanc wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Yodah says: Do not your breath hold until we controlled fusion have, else blue turn you will

controlled nuclear fusion is 30 years in the future where it has been since 1960 and will almost certainly be in 2043.

ruveyn


Maybe they're putting it off until gas and coal finally run out.


Coal will unfortunately be plentiful for almost two centuries. The very reason why uranium based nuclear plants aren't more popular across the globe, is because they could make coal worthless.