You're just going to have to accept that...
When you know perfectly well how things are and are trying your best under the system as it is as much as it sucks; the moment you give any sort of complaint about the current system and pine for a change, this statement comes, "Well, you're just going to have to accept that that's how things are right now." Like I didn't know that already, dumbass! God damn! Can I not speak my grievances without facing instant invalidation?
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
LtlPinkCoupe
Veteran
Joined: 7 Dec 2011
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,044
Location: In my room, where it's safe
Thanks, all. And believe me, I tore the mf'er a new one for that, the invalidating, presumptuous prick that he was.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
The person in question may be voicing this cringe-worthy invalidation out of his/her own exasperation. Many times, they, themselves, would like to institute change, but they are either lacking the knowledge, resources, time, or authority to institute said change. Thus, they express this to others as a way to say, "Look, I can't fix it right now!"; it is possible that they feel that you are accusing them, somehow, of being the cause of the problem.
I've heard in Psychology class that if you can make somebody feel that something was their idea, they're more likely to go along with the idea. I am not sure how one would apply this practically other than to drop the subtlest hints possible and hope that they eventually absorb them into their own thoughts.
_________________
I am not a textbook case of any particular disorder; I am an abstract, poetic portrayal of neurovariance with which much artistic license was taken.
In the case in question, the person was actually a new entrant to the conversation when they made that comment. Their very first comment was a response to that, so there was no previous engagement that would have caused them to think they were being accused.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
I've heard in Psychology class that if you can make somebody feel that something was their idea, they're more likely to go along with the idea. I am not sure how one would apply this practically other than to drop the subtlest hints possible and hope that they eventually absorb them into their own thoughts.
It's easy:
Wait for opportunity (never bring up topic yourself)
Give opinion
Receive invalidation/dismissal/mockery/confusion.
Wait
The idea will appear from another source.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger
I think my problem has to do with poor social communication, especially over the Internet. People usually get a bad impression of me, like I don't do my homework, I'm ignorant, I'm foolish, etc., and their impression surprises me, because I do make sure to do my homework, I study the topic well, I hash these issues out in great detail with my therapist, etc. Yet they always come in with the assumption I haven't been doing any of that, so when I complain, they think I'm just living in "fantasy land" or something, all discombobulated and floating around everywhere. It makes me wonder, if outside autistic forums like this, if it is ever worth it to ask for advice, because it's like I can't fully express the context I'm working in and people make all sorts of assumptions like my being poorly prepared and then they get all patronizing and stuff and I find their advice is basically worthless.
I've been having this frustration on the Internet ever since at least 2003. I remember on the Star Wars Galaxies forum posting a proof of 0.999... = 1 (0.999... is the repeating decimal where the nines go on forever), which I thought was really cool to show. I thought other people would think it was neat too, and I had checked it--I knew I had a good understanding of it. I also gave reliable sources like Dr. Math which had links to even more proofs. Yet that convinced no one, and it turned into a nasty argument, where I was insulted, demeaned, and belittled. I kept trying to redo the proofs, I kept trying to explain more clearly each step, and so on and so forth, to no avail.
Then, suddenly, a new poster appeared with a different proof, and all the other posters immediately acccepted it. Then they rounded on me and called me stupid, ret*d, saying that I suck at explaining and totally dehumanizing. I wanted to reach though my DSL line and strangle those people.
I find I have this struggle a lot, especially more so when I ask for advice. I am immediately faced with patronizing, dehumanizing people who apparently do not have a full understanding of the context in which I'm working (probably because I am still weak in pragmatics) and they round on me when I protest that their advice isn't going to work, calling me close-minded, stupid, ret*d, a piece of s**t, something that deserves to be thrown down a well (though not in so many words; it's clear that is their internal view of the situation, however).
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
I wonder if instead I should simply state my goal and have people ask me for the information they find relevant to give me advice for and to warn them to make no assumption.
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
Yeah, let them ask the questions. People take in new information in unpredictable ways. I wouldn't warn them about making assumptions though, because you would be assuming that they would.
_________________
People are strange, when you're a stranger
Faces look ugly when you're alone.
Morrison/Krieger
It's worked a lot better!
_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin
I've been having this frustration on the Internet ever since at least 2003. I remember on the Star Wars Galaxies forum posting a proof of 0.999... = 1 (0.999... is the repeating decimal where the nines go on forever), which I thought was really cool to show. I thought other people would think it was neat too, and I had checked it--I knew I had a good understanding of it. I also gave reliable sources like Dr. Math which had links to even more proofs. Yet that convinced no one, and it turned into a nasty argument, where I was insulted, demeaned, and belittled. I kept trying to redo the proofs, I kept trying to explain more clearly each step, and so on and so forth, to no avail.
Then, suddenly, a new poster appeared with a different proof, and all the other posters immediately acccepted it. Then they rounded on me and called me stupid, ret*d, saying that I suck at explaining and totally dehumanizing. I wanted to reach though my DSL line and strangle those people.
I find I have this struggle a lot, especially more so when I ask for advice. I am immediately faced with patronizing, dehumanizing people who apparently do not have a full understanding of the context in which I'm working (probably because I am still weak in pragmatics) and they round on me when I protest that their advice isn't going to work, calling me close-minded, stupid, ret*d, a piece of sh**, something that deserves to be thrown down a well (though not in so many words; it's clear that is their internal view of the situation, however).
Don't worry about the 0.999. = 1. I started a two week argument in a mathematics and physics department at a university by posing that question.
It was a lot of fun