online "support groups" for sex deprived males

Post Reply New Topic

this is beyond any level of "sick


http://www.takepart.com/article/2014/05 ... mpid=tp-fb

its the internet..it doesn't surprise me.

After all there's forums for everything. Even this one.

i have been abused (by a boss)for rejecting unwanted advances (from a customer).

Social failure is very likely caused by an underlying mental or neurological disorder, both of which can lead to a variety of delusions. Sites like PUAHate and Robot 9K are basically echo chambers for those delusions, because it brings comfort to have them reinforced by someone.

When I was married we had a business together and there was a lonely elderly man who use to come some days and stand in front of our store for hours holding a sign with his phone number begging my wife to call him. What can you do in that situation? Can't really chase a seventy year old man away for being lonely.

interesting, I don't recall dylan klebold mentioning a desire for s*, I think he just wanted to be loved and I don't recall any mention of s* in his journals nor an entitlement to being loved-I think he only hated other men. That is a much lower standard than this Elliot Rodgers pervert. I think most of society already rejects Elliot's ideologies, but all this #yesallwomen campaign is likely to do is repress certain adult male *ambitions* and reduce them down to Klebolds. Doh!

They're not quite 'deprived', are they? Like 'involuntarily celibate', it suggests that the problem is down to someone else keeping something from them that is rightfully theirs.

Cos its always the woman's fault? Doh!

I don't know of a single Aspie who hasn't known loneliness and rejection - that had been the story of my life till I met my wife. But I doubt few if any of us on WP would have seriously considered going on a homicidal rampage like Rodger did.

I never said it was a woman's fault, and the only ones here alluding to that conclusion are the feminist types who want to put words in other peoples mouths and hijack the dialog. The reality is the feminist movement neither address the problem nor offer to try to find a solution, they simply don't want a real dialog. There may be a good reason, because people of average intelligence will recognize feminism as the problem. I am not saying feminism is the cause, but that is the likely conclusion ordinary people will come to because it is the most obvious despite the fact that this social problem is more deeply rooted in our society. Not going to look good as feminist are being called out in trying to obscure the truth and being called out on it.

exactly what "truth" are feminists obscuring here? please provide evidence to support your claims that the feminist movement neither addresses or offers any solutions to this "problem", and also explain which "problem" it is you are referring to.

? What exactly are you trying to say?

Well, you say a campaign by women to highlight female experience of male harrasment will turn men into killers. The obvious interpretation, seeing as no-one wants to see men being killers, is that the campaign should stop. The causal link suggesting it would, indeed, be women's fault. Please do clarify if I misread your statement.

Further:

What are these 'adult male ambitions'?

Why would the campaign repress them?

What do you think the problem is?

Why would people of 'average intelligence' see feminism as the problem?

Why is feminism the 'most obvious' cause?

Where do you think the problem (see first question) is rooted?

What truth are feminists trying to obscure?

hopper, you aren't worth anyone's time or deserving of a response.

this is how one has a reasonable discussion??

what has hopper done to you (or anyone else in this thread, or elsewhere) to deserve such a comment? has he been rude or insulting to you? all he did was ask some relevant questions, as far as i can see. if that renders him unworthy of anyone's time, then what denotes worthiness?

hi starving,
I think he/she is hitting a pet peeve for having baby step people through some obvious things and the assertion of premises that are already argued to be false.

In looking back some things do deserve a response. Sorry hopper if I sounded rude.

That's ok. You weren't to know I'd lost my direct psychic connection to your brain so that I no longer knew what you meant when you were saying really quite vague things, about 'adult male ambitions' and 'repress' and 'the problem' and 'a good reason' and 'the cause' and 'ordinary people' and 'the truth' and feminist attempts to 'obscure' it.