Toy_Soldier wrote:
There's a little logic there, but I think mostly forgetfulness.
You forget the previous regime used snipers to kill dozens of its own citizens in the Kiev protests.
You forget the previous regime abandoned the previous track to draw closer to the EU in favor of being bankrolled and proxy controlled by Russia, which was what started the protests. The massacre of its own citizens is what brought on the coup.
You forget Russia has incited, armed, trained and provided soldiers to invade a different country (Ukraine). They started with Crimea and then Eastern Ukraine... where do they stop btw?
Does Mexico have the right to invade Texas, New Mexico, California, etc because of large ethnic Mexican population?
There was never proof that Yanukovych was responsible for the snipers, it wasn't the Berkut. There is plenty reason to believe that it was Maiden provocateurs who fired on protesters and Berkut alike.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1XVVKlIcbE[/youtube]
Crimea voted to join Russia, do you doubt that is the will of the people there? Crimea is mostly ethnic Russian and saw the government in Kiev as illegitimate and hostile to them, a good portion of the military and police defected so the accusations of Russian troops has been vastly exaggerated. You can have an issue with how it was done but the end result is still the valid expression of the wishes of the people of the Crimean peninsula. Do you find the Kosovo to be legitimate? There is no way you can deny the self determination of Crimea. I think it applies to eastern Ukraine as well, the people that live there are the ones I side with. Western Ukraine should have the right as well but they apparently think it is right subjugate half the country.
The US and EU really have no moral high ground to condemn the interference in other countries, they have their own ulterior motives in Ukraine. The coup government has killed way more civilians now than Yanukovych supposedly did, its indefensible imo.