Page 1 of 4 [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next


What OS do you use?
Poll ended at 18 Sep 2015, 10:23 am
Linux 43%  43%  [ 27 ]
Unix 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Mac 11%  11%  [ 7 ]
DOS 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Windows XP 3%  3%  [ 2 ]
Windows Vista 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Windows 7 27%  27%  [ 17 ]
Windows 8.1 13%  13%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 63

Rudin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jun 2015
Age: 23
Posts: 1,046
Location: Southern Ontario

10 Jun 2015, 10:23 am

I use Linux specifically Ubuntu which gets the job done for me. I find it is the best Linux distribution.

What OS do you use?


_________________
"God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going on with prime numbers."

-Paul Erdos

"There are two types of cryptography in this world: cryptography that will stop your kid sister from looking at your files, and cryptography that will stop major governments from reading your files."

-Bruce Schneider


RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

10 Jun 2015, 10:33 am

I'm on Manjaro Linux (testing branch) with Gnome desktop. Can't go without Pacman and MHWD.



Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

10 Jun 2015, 4:21 pm

This one,(desktop system) has the current Debian Jessie with MATE. XFCE, Desktops, and the OpenBox WM on it. -- I've been running for a few months before Jessie became the current Stable Edition of Debian

My Toughbook is still running the now sadly missed CrunchBang spin of Debian Wheezy on it with an upgraded 3.16 Kernel. It's also running a hakced version of the current Debian Stable in Virtualbox. -- I'm debating on whether I should rust install current stable with MATE DE on the drive outright.


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

10 Jun 2015, 4:58 pm

I use OpenBSD for servers and Linux for workstations.

I doubt that anyone here has ever seen DOS. Plenty have seen MS-DOS and other microcomputer disk operating systems, but unless they worked for the right company at the right time in the right capacity in the 1960s or maybe early 1970s, it is doubtful that they ever saw DOS.



Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

10 Jun 2015, 5:14 pm

I have to use windows 7, the music software that I run only works with 7-- not even 8.1 and certainly not any linux distro. That being said I've used Debian in the past and it was good, if you really like fiddling with stuff.



Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

10 Jun 2015, 5:31 pm

eric76 wrote:
I use OpenBSD for servers and Linux for workstations.

I doubt that anyone here has ever seen DOS. Plenty have seen MS-DOS and other microcomputer disk operating systems, but unless they worked for the right company at the right time in the right capacity in the 1960s or maybe early 1970s, it is doubtful that they ever saw DOS.


The 60's and the '70's was pretty much the 'wild west' era of computingdue to the fact that until the advent of Bell Labs UNIX, every computer was pretty much a proprietary system. UNIX finally provided a standardised OS platform. -- Still though there was a lot of wierd stuff running on hardware into the 80's, and a lot of Zero Tolerance, mission critical equipment has proprietary software written in Assembly code controlling it. Sattelites, space exploration. and some military hardware comes to mind.

That being said, I remember QDOS systems in the 80's and 90's.


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

10 Jun 2015, 5:34 pm

Aristophanes wrote:
I have to use windows 7, the music software that I run only works with 7-- not even 8.1 and certainly not any linux distro. That being said I've used Debian in the past and it was good, if you really like fiddling with stuff.


Out of curiousity, what music software are you running?


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

10 Jun 2015, 5:47 pm

Fogman wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
I have to use windows 7, the music software that I run only works with 7-- not even 8.1 and certainly not any linux distro. That being said I've used Debian in the past and it was good, if you really like fiddling with stuff.


Out of curiousity, what music software are you running?


It's actually not the software, it's the hardware to run the software. I have an old soundblaster audigy 2 zs platinum circa 2004. I don't record, I only use vst instruments so I need the asio drivers for low latency and I don't see the need to drop $400+ for an entire mixing solution when all I need are the asio drivers. That being said I'm not young anymore so I don't really enjoy fiddling with stuff anymore, lol. I'd rather just use the package that just works and troubleshoot if I run into problems. I don't see that happening with a Linux distro. Granted Bill Gates is the devil, but I'll deal with the devil for simple convenience nowadays.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

11 Jun 2015, 12:54 am

Here is some info about the DOS operating sytem. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS/360_and_successors:

Quote:
Disk Operating System/360, also DOS/360, or simply DOS, was an operating system for IBM mainframes. It was announced by IBM on the last day of 1964, and it was first delivered in June 1966. In its time, DOS was the most widely used operating system in the world.

Although their names are similar, there are no technical similarities between DOS/360 of the 1960s and the x86-DOS of the 1980s.


The weirdest OS I ever wrote software for was a Data General Supernova.

The program was on punch cards. I would load the punch cards onto a Data General Nova to compile the program and produce an executable on a paper tape. I would then take the paper tape over to the Supernova, start it up, enter the program to read the paper tape with toggle switches, and load the paper tape. Once the paper tape was loaded, it would then execute.

What I thought was the oddest thing about the Nova family of minicomputers was the autoincrement and autodecrement memory locations. There were something like 8 or 16 of each in a specific area of low memory. You would write a value into the location and then every time you accessed the value at that location it would automagically decrement or increment the memory depending on its address.

In general, though, I liked the PDP-11 and VAX computers best for doing assembly language.



hilaryy_renee_
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2014
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 176
Location: SoCal ~ Los Angeles

11 Jun 2015, 1:00 am

I'm currently using OS X Yosemite on my Apple Macbook laptop. :roll:


_________________
"Human behavior flows from three main sources: desire, emotion, and knowledge." ~ Plato


mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada

11 Jun 2015, 1:44 am

I was a Linux evangelist for a while, but to be honest, I've gotten sick of using it, so nowadays I mainly use Windows 7. Ironic, as I used to hate Windows 7, but now that I've figured out how to customize it to my liking, I'd say it's one of the best operating systems Microsoft's ever made, up there with Windows 2000 and MS DOS 6.22.

I might get back into Linux again if I get bored, but for now, Win7 just works. I've also been curious about giving some flavor of BSD a try, though I've heard there aren't any good AMD graphics drivers for it. I'm also thinking of giving Gentoo another try, though you really need to have another Linux distro already set up to install it. As it is, I'm planning on wiping my hard drive and starting fresh, as I don't like Xubuntu 15.04, and Win7 has been having some minor, but annoying issues ever since I switched motherboards.



AspergersActor8693
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2014
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,231
Location: At Duelist Kingdom rescuing my brother.

11 Jun 2015, 11:51 am

I am currently running Windows Vista Home Premium on my Lenovo 3000 series desktop. Contrary to popular belief, Vista has been very reliable and I have had almost no major problems in my time of using it. My Lenovo Thinkpad R61i laptop is running Windows XP Pro, but I don't use my laptop as much as my desktop. I will also sometimes on occasion tinker with old Windows OS's and Linux OS's on my old desktops and laptop.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 39,637
Location: Long Island, New York

11 Jun 2015, 11:52 am

Windows 7 Home Premium


_________________
“Self Acceptance is a process not a performance”
“You are autistic enough. And you always have been”

Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity.


morslilleole
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 511
Location: Norway

11 Jun 2015, 12:57 pm

My main computer is running Windows 7, though I intend to install Manjaro Linux on it ( way better for programming and just about everything else )

I also have an older laptop that's running Manjaro Linux which I use for programming. I want to install Manjaro on the main computer because it's newer and has better performance so I can use it for more intensive graphics / game programming.


_________________
Want to learn to make games? http://headerphile.com/


mr_bigmouth_502
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Dec 2013
Age: 32
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 7,028
Location: Alberta, Canada

11 Jun 2015, 11:58 pm

AspergersActor8693 wrote:
I am currently running Windows Vista Home Premium on my Lenovo 3000 series desktop. Contrary to popular belief, Vista has been very reliable and I have had almost no major problems in my time of using it. My Lenovo Thinkpad R61i laptop is running Windows XP Pro, but I don't use my laptop as much as my desktop. I will also sometimes on occasion tinker with old Windows OS's and Linux OS's on my old desktops and laptop.


Vista and 7 are almost the same thing, the only reason Vista got such a bad rep is because they released it too soon and OEMs shipped it on horrendously underpowered machines. Vista/7 really need at least 4GB of ram and a good dual core CPU (like a Core2 Duo; NOT an early one like a Pentium D or Athlon 64x2) to shine.

Also, I just wiped the OS drive on my desktop, so right now I only have 7 installed. I did it to resolve some issues with slow bootups, allocate more space for Windows 7, and because I was too lazy to go through the process of overwriting GRUB with the Windows bootloader. Truth be told, I kind of regret it now, since there are tons of settings I have to go back to and change again. Reinstalling wasn't as big a deal with XP, since Nlite could preconfigure all my tweaks for me, but for some reason, NTLite isn't as good for that with 7.



DRzero
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2014
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 95
Location: USA

13 Jun 2015, 8:31 am

My experience is similar. I mostly use Windows 7. Initially I disliked it, because of the changes from XP that weren't improvements. But I've discovered some changes that are improvements, and learned how to take advantage of them. I also use Classic Shell (which is free), which makes the Start Menu useful, and Everything (also free), which is a good file-search utility (Windows used to have one, but no longer :( ).

I'm learning Linux, since it's better for some things, it's free, and it's more customizable. I use Antergos, which is a variant of Arch, with the default Cinammon UI. Antergos is easy to install, and I prefer Cinammon to the other Linux UI's that I've tried. Arch is lean and easy to customize.

I learned about Antergos on WP! :pirat:


mr_bigmouth_502 wrote:
I was a Linux evangelist for a while, but to be honest, I've gotten sick of using it, so nowadays I mainly use Windows 7. Ironic, as I used to hate Windows 7, but now that I've figured out how to customize it to my liking, I'd say it's one of the best operating systems Microsoft's ever made, up there with Windows 2000 and MS DOS 6.22.

I might get back into Linux again if I get bored, but for now, Win7 just works. I've also been curious about giving some flavor of BSD a try, though I've heard there aren't any good AMD graphics drivers for it. I'm also thinking of giving Gentoo another try, though you really need to have another Linux distro already set up to install it. As it is, I'm planning on wiping my hard drive and starting fresh, as I don't like Xubuntu 15.04, and Win7 has been having some minor, but annoying issues ever since I switched motherboards.


_________________
DRzero