Enigmatic_Oddity wrote:
I don't think he missed the point. The media's job is to report facts, not politically correct hogwash. If going out and announcing the killer was schizophrenic or autistic is going to cause backlash against said groups, that's not the media's responsibility. If they emphasise it, then they do so not out of recklessness, but out of a desire to tell the truth - and that may well be that the killer's deeds were primarily a result of his condition/s.
It is not simply reporting a diagnosis. It is doing things such as listing it as one of the bullet points in a story, mentioning it once, and following the one-sentence mention which was nothing more than "He was diagnosed as autistic" followed by a sentence saying he was always cold, a quote from his grandmother.
I don't care if his diagnosis is listed. I do care how it is listed. You can tell the truth without making one component seem like the a largely contributing factor to the cause. If my memory serves me well, the diagnosis was reported as having been made around when he was 8. That could be a very incomplete diagnosis. If this is the case, the media has emphasized his mental health with only a portion of the facts.