Off topic for a moment:
Raph522 wrote:
Aspie_for_the_Lord wrote:
Raph522 wrote:
8O you posed it on another forum?
yes... the Computers, Math, Science...
I know I'm not one to give spelling advice, but you should spell post with a T. You might confuse people otherwise.
Aspie_for_the_Lord wrote:
hehehe... whooopsie...
ya got me there
i POSTED it in another Forum....
Hah! nothing wrong with the spelling. You "posed" the question somewhere else! I can't spell either....
Darn English language... there are three entries for "post" in my websters dictionary, with a total of 29 meanings.
I've already taken too many tests.. Better part of a day, one time recently; but always like helping my own kids with their assignments. I took your test but dawdled while eating breakfast and sipping coffee... time elements will impact accuracy, I’m sure I answered them all correctly...
On topic:
1. 40 N/A -- 51 now
2. M
3. 120
Off topic again: IMO, general I.Q. tests are erroneous, as they tend not to spot the splinter into genius some have. Such as not noticing someone in the top 2% with regard to spatial reasoning, while in the bottom 2% when tying shoes. This test should really not be used as measure of one’s gift. It would be low in IQ to do so. I actual prefer using a newly coined term: Adaptability Quotient – AQ.
Respectfully, Beammeup
_________________
Welcome to the 'Playpen'...
Serious stuff goes on too!