Medical Marijuana Card Holders - No Guns For You!

Post Reply New Topic

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/31/ap ... lders.html

This is just the beginning of the Left going after the guns.

According to this article, there is a question on the Federal background check that asks if the person has a medical marijuana card. It doesn't matter then if marijuana is legal in that state - Federal law says marijuana is illegal in every state.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... itutional/

The way I see it, they are trying to make law abiding citizens who are using marijuana legally because of an illness turn into law breakers - for one to keep their second amendment rights, you'll have to purchase marijuana through illegal means.

Does this also mean that they can seize guns that a marijuana card holder already has in their possession? Is that what comes next?

The Obama administration is looking to grab guns wherever they can, they've also gone after SSI recipients. They also are very wary about returning veterans owning guns too. This why electing Trump is important because if Hillary becomes president then she will be coming for the guns and you better believe that!

Marijuana will likely be legal recreationally in this state and all over the west coast very soon, they won't be able to discriminate against medical patients or how could they? I don't think this is constitutional under the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 10th, and 14th amendment.

I don't see the sense in that.

Also though you should be more specific....the left is a vast and varied demographic and not everyone in it holds the same opinions or views.

infringement -- the action of limiting or undermining something.

At least one law is very specific.

How is this a move from the left? It's a federal judge, approved by the senate in 2010, where the Republicans all voted for this judge, and no one voted against. I agree that illegal drug users and the mentally ill should not be able to buy guns. All the more reason for legalizing MJ on the Federal level.

I feel that the right's answer to most every question is to take away legal personhood.

For example, when people were homeless, denizens, or on social security.

While I would rather not be beholden to any court, at any level, the globalists have said that some rights are universal to all humans.

I may review these, to see whether self medication and self defense are counted as self-determination.

As for the mentally ill, AS people keep coming up, in the news.

Tyrannies have used psychiatric treatment, to punish dissidents, accused of having 'slow schizophrenia,' and autism has been regarded as a mild form of dissociation -- literally, slow schizophrenia.

You were probably, mostly harmless, so were expecting not to be prioritized.

But, people have been prioritized on the basis of philosophy, harmless or otherwise, as it is said that having the wrong political view is like having no soul. (Mao)

What are your thoughts on pedantism and conformity. Do they seem valuable, to you, on an emotional level? Aren't you technically supposed to say yes? Do you feel distant from all of that?

I think authoritarians relate that to having no soul. To call someone autistic is now a fascist insult.

Extra stupid in light of alcohol being legal. I'd trust a stoned gun carrier over a drunk one any day.