What's your opinion of Mad Max Fury Road?

Page 1 of 1 [ 8 posts ] 

I_Heart_Unicorns
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 60

02 Nov 2016, 7:30 pm

I bought Mad Max Fury Road on DVD the other day because I'd heard/read good things about it.
What's your opinion of it?
Many people are raving about it, but I don't really get the fuss.
I do appreciate the technical skill of creating a 2-hour car-chase movie - I mean the choreography (and I do think that's the right word) of the whole 2-hour chase is incredibly clever and skillful. The vehicles look stunning, and even the bloke playing the guitar with the 500 gazillion speakers behind him, which for a millisecond made me think "WTF?", actually made me laugh.
But the plot is incredibly weak. Basically Furiosa decides to rescue the breeders and take them to the "green place". But it's gone, so they decide to go back to the citadel (with the seeds) and take it over.
I don't think I missed anything plot-wise, did I?
I mean it's not a terrible plot, but it's not that deep and I don't understand why the film is getting the rave reviews it's getting.
I found the action exciting in parts, and there's a lot of action, but a film needs more than just (well executed) action, doesn't it?


_________________
It were proper bo I tell thee


tb86
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Sep 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,834
Location: South Wales

02 Nov 2016, 11:04 pm

The film is praised more for its action than its story. It's adrenaline fueled action and it one of the very rare uses of non cgi effects. I don't think there was any cgi at all. Personally I consider an action masterpiece up there with the likes of Terminator 2 and Die Hard. Ive never been a Mad Max fan. I've only seen the first two and while the first film was OK the second one which was considered the best until Fury Road came along is kinda dull to me.



KyleTheGhost
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 70,264
Location: Wisconsin

03 Nov 2016, 3:00 pm

Awesome.


_________________
I am Ashley. My pronouns are she/her.


CyclopsSummers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,172
Location: The Netherlands

05 Nov 2016, 1:15 am

For once, I am in full agreement with tb86. Many critics as well as the general audience agree that the plot of Fury Road is paper-thin, but it was very, very refreshing to see an action film that makes so much use of practical stunts and effects, when most action films that come out are mostly CGI-dependent. The movie was also quite highly anticipated because it was the first new entry into the Mad Max franchise in about 30 years, and we weren't sure how Tom Hardy would pull through-- but he did fine. He quite got that stoic, subtly shell-shocked lone drifter down to a tee. And Theron's Furiosa was a great foil for him.


_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action


Tollorin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

05 Nov 2016, 5:30 pm

The plot is simple but not weak; it's explore very actual themes. A lot of the story is told through visuals and has more things to say with a few lines that most of today Hollywood movies in their entirety.


_________________
Down with speculators!! !


CyclopsSummers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,172
Location: The Netherlands

08 Nov 2016, 3:08 am

^Cool, I really like Leon Thomas. I first became aware of him when he was on Channel Awesome, where he always seemed like an odd fit; among all the fake-angry reviewers with their comedic skits, Thomas' approach toward the subject matter was refreshingly profound, even if I don't always agree with his opinions, either from an aesthetical or a sociopolitical standpoint. But I don't have to.


_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action


Amaltheia
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 154
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

08 Nov 2016, 3:37 am

It’s a great action movie, but it’s also a solid bit of SF film making. It’s a post-apocalypse story, but it deals with a period generally skipped over in the sub-genre. Most post-apocalypse stories either take place in the immediate aftermath amid the ruins or are set a few generations later when new societies have arisen. Fury Road is set one generation into the post-apocalypse world; some of the characters are old enough to remember the apocalypse and even the pre-apocalypse world, but most of them were born after and this world is all they have ever known. As such, the film deals with the transmission of knowledge and culture and the way that the new generation takes what it has inherited and adapts that to its own needs.

You can see this in the design of the film. All the props in the film are made from repurposed bits and pieces of the old world: Max’s face-mask/bridle is an old gardening fork and some metal straps, the skulls/heads on Rictus Erectus’ costume are all dolls’ heads, steering wheels are made from old radio parts and rotary phone dials, and so on. This is a society that has gone from scavenging old technology to just using what they find as a resource for making something new; so much so that you have to look closely to recognise what the components of an item originally were.

It’s also reflected in the language of the film. The dialogue is full of words and phrases that are close enough to current usage that we can understand what is being said, but which suggest slang and a society that has taken old words and ideas and adapted them to their current needs: “We are Fucacima kamakrazee war boys!”, “You traitored him!”, “Die historic on the Fury Road”, and so on.

All this, of course, picks up on elements Miller introduced in the previous entries in the Mad Max series: Mad Max: the Road Warrior (1981) and Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome (1985), suggesting that Miller is slowly constructing an entire future history, with each installment moving a bit further on from the apocalypse and into this strange new world.

All this is done quietly and unobtrusively. A film version of Heinlein's famous example of “the door dilated” — no big bits of exposition or explanation; the world exists and is presented as it exists with the viewer expected to pay attention and pick up the details as the story unfolds, building their own picture of how things work. That’s how good SF works — or, at least, that’s one of the things I look for in SF.

All this in an action movie that never stops being an action movie. Every frame is used to advance the plot. The characters are established and delineated through their actions. Each character does something; they all have goals and pursue those goals as effectively as their knowledge, skill and circumstances permit.

The characters are memorable: Immortan Joe, Imperator Furiosa, the War Boy Nux, minor characters (in terms of screen time) such as the Bullet Farmer and the People Eater. Even the wives, who could have all been interchangeable MacGuffins, come across as individuals with their own distinct personalities.

Then there’s Max Rockatansky himself; a man seeking redemption even though (by my count) he’s already achieved redemption twice. Watching this film you realise this is a character who is not going to accept redemption, no matter what he achieves or accomplishes. Whose sense of guilt is so strong that all he can dwell on is his failures, no matter what his successes are. A man who will walk away from his accomplishments, as he does at the end of the film, to seek a lasting redemption that he will probably never find. A surprisingly tragic figure in what is a franchise of action movies.

That's my take on it.



I_Heart_Unicorns
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 60

08 Nov 2016, 5:39 pm

Well, I've read online that Fury Road mainly uses real effects as opposed to CGI, and while I admire the incredible skill involved in the real effects/stunts in this film, all we're talking about is effects at the end of the day.
Effects are great when well done (as they are in Fury Road), but generally I prefer good cinematography, good plot, good dialogue, good acting.
Apart from good cinematography, Fury Road imo has very few of the other things that make a good film.
What do other people think?


_________________
It were proper bo I tell thee