Diagnosis Question

Post Reply New Topic

I have a question about diagnosis when there is no distress. My understanding is they don't diagnose autism without distress.

Imagine two people X and Y are equally autistic one year and could be diagnosable if they sought it (depression, bullying, no friends, etc.). As years pass X gets lucky and finds a wife who's compatible with his quirks, happy marriage, also works on changing some of his behaviors based on feedback from coworkers so they don't interfere with work, etc. Maybe he still can't make friends, but point is he's figured out enough to have a happy life on his own and hold down a good job.

Y does not do those things so still has bigger issues. Thus years later they are still both equally autistic, but since X figured out how to get his life together, I'm assuming he's no longer "diagnosable" even though Y still is.

Question: Is it possible for X to get a confirmation of autism in a situation like that? Even if it's not officially called a "diagnosis"?

Autism is genetic and you can get genome sequencing.
I was lucky and someone had my genome sequenced using my 23andme data and I didn't have to pay for it.
I know now I have autism 12q. I have mutations on genes on the long arm of chromosome 12 that are associated with autism. I also have mutations on other genes and a list of polymorphisms also contributing to autism.

It's not exactly a diagnosis but it can explain a lot about yourself. And it's sooooo interesting.

.

I would suspect that X is still experiencing the distress, even if it isn't showing on the surface.

My life was 'together' before my diagnosis. Marriage, children, a good career, very happy. But the assessment goes into what's happening below the surface, what's happened in the past, how hard it is to keep up that 'together' life day-to-day.

I don't think that would get missed.