Do Aspies tend to be less religious than the average person?

Post Reply New Topic

---and, I can't help but wonder why some things are more easily accepted, than others (for instance, things we can't see - like radio waves or atoms, etc.), just because someone TOLD us, they exist.
**********************************************************************

There is overwhelming evidence, both direct and indirect, that atoms and electromagnetic waves exist. It is NOT the same as belief in a magical man who lives in the sky.

Physics is ultimately evidence-based and backed up by mathematics. Science is so great because it cannot only explain things that happened in the past but also predict things. Also we use radio waves daily, so we have direct proof of them even though we don't see them. Also, we have nuclear fission, i.e. our model of atoms must be somewhat correct as far as I understand (I'm no physicist).

Science is discovered truth by proven by repeatable experiment.

Religion is revealed truth by some people who wrote down what they believe which is not testable and not repeatable.

If I heat some water it will sooner or later turn to gas (steam).
If I heat some water it will never turn to solid (ice).

Radio waves exist. You can build a basic transmitter and receiver from easily available components and test it for yourself. Every scientific experiment can be, and is, tested repeatedly. That is what science means.

You can spend your whole life praying. No god will speak to you and you will never be able to prove its existence.

I am less religious than the average person.

I am probably more pedantic than the average person.

I also have more legs than the average person

Huh?

You have three (or more) legs?

Well...I guess she's not a mermaid

Some people due to accident or birth defect have one or no legs.

If one person in a group of ten has no legs then ten people have eighteen legs between them.

So the average is (9x2)/10=1.8 Or, 18 legs divided by 10 people equals 1.8 legs.

Even if only one person in the whole world was missing one leg the average would be less than two.

I have two legs which is more than the average.

See! I told you I am probably more pedantic than the average person!

You have got to be f*****g kidding me. People with less than two legs are so few and far between its statistically meaningless.

That doesn't make sense to me

Always depends on how many decimal places you want to use

Exactly , even though the average would be less than two the answer would be something like 1.9999999999 ( maybe some more 9's ).

If someone has 1.99999999999999 legs - this would equate to missing a toenail or even a scab on one leg.

Maybe I'm being pedantic now

Haha, hadn't thought of the toenail thing...makes matters even more complex

I'm not real sure what you're asking, here..... If you're asking me whether I think the question in this, your thread's title, was asked because of what I said about some Aspies seeming to want to put all of life in a neat little package, then "Yes", I DO believe that is indicative of the mentality, I've described.

We have faith, however consciously, in things, IMO, in practically every single day of our lives..... We have faith in that we will wake-up, tomorrow. We have faith that we won't get into a traffic accident, while on our way to work / school / wherever. We have faith, that we've studied enough to pass our test. We have faith that we'll manage to not get into a fight with our boss, on any given day..... There is NO evidence, for ANY of these things, until "the end"----until the day / time, comes. Do you feel that's a good reason to stop believing in those things?

As for "evidence" that God exists, people who believe-in / follow God (as I do), believe we have evidence of his existence. I can totally see how The Big Bang Theory (the actual theory, not the TV show), is possible----but, then, how did everything else come to be? Did animals and birds, and trees, and daffodils, and humans, etc., just "appear", out of nowhere? How is that possible? There are those that believe the sun is the center of our solar system----what if that was intentional that it was "placed", that way; that it's location has a meaning, of which we're still unaware? How is it that a person's brain, and not our BUTTS, is the CPU of our bodies, so-to-speak, without some being "making" it, that way? How many unanswered questions can you fathom, that there might be? For people-of-faith, the answer is simple: "God did it!!"----but, like I said, there are many who feel (myself, included) that the question of "Why?" hasn't been answered; but, again, like I said, we who have faith are okay with that, because we know ALOT of things, in life, haven't been answered (and may never be, in our lifetime).

I feel that it's quite possible that people who absolutely NEED "evidence", are a bit of a "control freak", maybe----and, I can totally understand this, as I was one, myself, when I was a "kid" (like, all the way up, through my 20s). My theory is, we want to control what's on the OUTside, cuz we can't control anything, on the INside----and, there's just GOTTA be some semblance of "organized", SOMEWHERE; ALSO, there's just GOTTA be some ANSWERS, somewhere, and goodness knows there's no "answer" (there's a NAME, but no answer, IMO) for why we Aspies, for instance, are so friggin' weird (I mean, the dichotomies ABOUND - what's with being "stupid" and "smart", at-the-SAME-time?).

As for one "risking harm, by not knowing what's going to happen, next": How could ANYBODY know, ONE HUNDRED percent, what's gonna happen next? I mean, we could speculate 'til the cows come-home, that it won't be anything bad----but, all we can REALLY do, is have faith, that it won't be; and, IMO, the "harm" would come, in worrying about it.

You are correct that people who are uncomfortable without answers probably have a tendency to be control freaks. I certainly tend to be one with certain issues, ones that I feel could impact my well being if I do not get answers.

As for having faith that terrible things won't happen to you, many people have hope instead of faith. I have hope I won't get into an accident or get terminally ill, but I don't have faith that these things won't happen because there is no evidence these things won't happen with only faith.

I admit I do not have all the answers on how exactly modern humans formed, though I certainly do not believe in the intelligent design theory. Evolution likely is the answer, but being the type of person I am, I will not commit to any theory without 100% certainty. I am a man who admits he does not know the answer when he does not know the answer. My whole life revolves around searching for truth. If you want to live by faith, that is your choice.

Well, I and others who believe-in / follow God, feel there is overwhelming evidence, that God exists. Who's to say, who's right? There's no evidence, IMO, that either of us, is wrong (only subjective opinions, IMO)----and besides, why can't we BOTH be right (or wrong), and why can't all three of these things (and others), exist, concurrently----why does it always seem to have to be science, for instance, OR God?

Also, another thing that seems to often happen, in discussions like this, is that people seem to think that things only come into existence, when a scientist, for instance "discovers" them, names them, and/or assigns an equation, to them. Did lapis just magically come-into being, some day, right before someone put their foot down on it, or whatever, in the Caucasus Mountains, for instance? Did a tree just magically appear, as someone walked-along, and that someone thought "Hmm, I'm gonna call this new thing a 'cedar tree'"? I believe all things existed, already (meaning, before someone discovered them), and it just took someone to discover them, and give us a name for them, so we would know how to reference them, henceforth----AND, I have a MUCH easier time believing some being (or, "magical man who lives in the sky", if you'd like), created these things, than that they "just appeared", or whatever.

Don't get me wrong, I LOVE science----and have great appreciation / respect for it----but, if science is "all facts, all-the-time", why is it that Pluto is no longer considered a planet (or, at least, as significant, or whatever)? What if, a hundred years, from now, someone comes-along, and says Neil DeGrasse Tyson, was WRONG? Does that mean we, who believed Mr. Tyson's declaration, were all idiots?

Edit: I had initially said "before Mr. Tyson's declaration", and I meant "as of" Mr. Tyson's declaration----so, I had to change it.

Last edited by Campin_Cat on 27 Jul 2017, 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.