20th century music sticks in Millennial minds more

Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,478
Location: Long Island, New York

07 Feb 2019, 5:52 pm

Millennials prefer music from 20th century ‘golden age’ to the pop of today, research suggests

Quote:
Research has suggested that modern music really isn’t as good as the old classics. A study has found that golden oldies stick in millennials’ minds far more than the relatively bland, homogenous pop of today. A golden age of popular music lasted from the 1960s to the 1990s, academics claimed. Songs from this era proved to be much more memorable than tunes released in the 21st century.

Scientists tested a group of millennials on their ability to recognise hit records from different decades. The 643 participants, typically aged 18 to 25, maintained a steady memory of top tunes that came out between 1960 and 1999. In contrast, their memory of 21st-century songs from 2000 to 2015 – while higher overall – diminished rapidly over time. Lead researcher Dr Pascal Wallisch, from New York University in the US, said: ‘The 1960s to 1990s was a special time in music, reflected by a steady recognition of pieces of that era-even by today’s millennials.’ During this period songs reaching the top of the US Billboard charts were significantly more varied than they were between 2000 to 2015, or the 1940s and 1950s, said the scientists.

Well known examples included ‘When a Man Loves a Woman’ by Percy Sledge (1966), ‘Baby Come Back’ by Player (1977) and ‘The Tide is High’ by Blondie (1980). Others, including ‘Knock Three Times’ by Dawn (1970), ‘I’m Sorry’ by John Denver (1975) and ‘Truly’ by Lionel Richie (1982) were all but forgotten. Songs selected for the study included those that reached number one on the Billboard Top 100 between 1940 and 1957, and the top slot on the Billboard ‘Hot 100’ from 1958 to 2015. Each participant was presented with short excerpts from a random selection of seven out of 152 songs and asked to say if they recognised them.

The ‘recognition proportion’ for each song was then plotted as a function of the year when it was a hit. A steep drop-off in recognition was seen for hits produced between the years 2015 and 2000, and a more gradual decline for songs of the 1950s and 1940s. However, songs from the 1960s to 1990s generated a ‘stable plateau’ of music recognition. Unexpectedly a strong correlation was seen between the likelihood of recognising a song and its play count on Spotify. ‘Spotify was launched in 2008, well after nearly 90% of the songs we studied were released, which indicates millennials are aware of the music that, in general, preceded their lives and are nonetheless choosing to listen to it,’ said Dr Wallisch.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


la_fenkis
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,994
Location: My apartment

10 Feb 2019, 1:44 am

- The article provides no link to the study nor its name, only breadcrumbs. VERY worrying.
- Here it is: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/artic ... ne.0210066
- The study does not cover preference, only recognition.
- The article drastically misrepresents the study, as I worried. It's clickbait.

This reeks of "some scientists found a way to measure which music is better, and it's ours. See, they wrote an article too, so suck it young people."

From the study:

"However, it is also possible that involuntary exposure through film, television and radio or accidental exposure through music discovery services such as Pandora allows people to discover music that might be very old indeed. Finally, people might also intentionally seek out the music of previous generations. In principle—as much, if not all music is recorded and digitally available forever—this could prevent a cultural horizon indefinitely. We are unable to distinguish these possibilities in the present study.

This study has other limitations as well. For instance, we used Spotify play counts, numbers of covers and numbers of samples as a proxy for total music exposure. We do not have data on how often individuals listen to music in analog format, on other web-based platforms, on the radio, or are exposed to music in everyday life in other forms such as movie and television soundtracks, or simply as background music. Put differently, all of the observed recognition effects might be entirely driven by exposure, but our measure of exposure is noisy if not biased, lowering the proportion of variance in recognition rates for which we cannot account. In addition, it is possible that newer music has greater play counts on Spotify for several reasons, none of which are mutually exclusive, and none of which we can distinguish. For instance, older music might be more readily available in analog formats such as cassette tapes or vinyl records, which could lower the digital play count of such music. Conversely, it is also possible that the average Spotify user—who is between the age of 13 and 29 [18]—preferentially listens to the music of their generation."

and

"Music is a complex phenomenon and songs are not unaffected by the socio-cultural context in which they are released, and this might in turn impact how they are remembered."