Fnord wrote:
I left out "Mostly Yes" and "Mostly No" because you either believe that the entire Bible is the complete and inerrant Word of God or you don't -- there should be no wavering on this, right?
I don’t agree with your black and white approach, here Fnord. Are you in the camp of the complete and inerrant Word of God yourself? As I said previously there are parts that I believe are allegorical in the same way that Jesus uses parables. It is quite clear from the context that he is using allegory. Prophetic visions are also quite clear from the context, Daniels prophetic dreams for example use the term ‘weeks’ that can be understood as groups of 7 time periods, rather than groups os seven days (literal meaning). The different denominations do have different degrees of literalness, from say Anglican at one end of the spectrum to seventh Day Adventists at the other. I think I fall between the two extremes.
It does sound to me like you are wanting to only dialogue with a specific theological outlook and I am curious about that. I had hoped for a more interested response to my comments, as I am interested in what you might have to say.
_________________
Not a Moderator.
AQ 40
ASD-1