la_fenkis wrote:
Sometimes they'll even use ad hominem attacks to try to make a person more malleable to their guile.
Of course, neither naivete, authority, nor consensus have any bearing on truth in either direction, only the merit of the involved concepts themselves as they relate to reality.
I found your post a little ambiguous.
Old age, ya know.
Some people compartmentalise and filter out relevant considerations when creating an intellectual construct, such as instinctual influences, psychological tendencies, cultural dogma, level of life wisdom, intellectual capacity, excessive emotional influences enticing emotionalism and catastrophisation.
I hope you are not one of "those people".
All had been considered in my post to Greta's twin brother, Wolfram.
Many questions in life are extremely complex, grasshopper.
One must embrace a greater perspective to appreciate the entire picture, even if the process causes discomfort during that personal growth.
Walk towards enlightenment, my child.
<om mani padme hum>
<exit ninja-philosophy mode>
You've clearly misunderstood what I was saying. Anyways, I'm disengaging.