EzraS wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
EzraS wrote:
The unnamed 5 was a tongue-in-cheek thing that had nothing to do with this.
Seemed more serious than "tongue in cheek" and therein lies a problem if you and others can accuse us of things and expect we won't react back. Strange double standard?
The 5 was fictitious. It was something that ended up getting taken seriously by people who decided I was talking about them when I was not. And I did apologize for starting it.
Don't recall an apology but again if you expect us to take your word then I would expect the same from you when I apologise.
Also a good idea to stop dragging up your age and disability as an excuse when discussions aren't going your way.