I’m paste quoting in one of my posts from January, that gives my thoughts on the general cultural forces lying behind a lot of what’s happening in terms of big politics across the West in our times: in the hope that it’ll be helpful food for thought:
(The original thread was on cancel culture and affirmative action for context, and had got rather heated: which is why I concluded the way I did... the thread died two posts after this one.)
Quote:
I’d think it would be more accurate to characterise what has occurred as the slow disintegration of the moral/ethical universe that was inherited down to the ‘50s/early 60s over a period from roughly 1965-95.
Symbolically one could think of this as Hippies, followed by Punks followed by Thatcher/Reaganite Neoliberals. (I’m including the last since in effect, although certainly not in intent, they undermined much of the presumed standards in state and corporate management).
However: no culture or society can survive as a group without some form of basic shared values.
Hence we see the rise of contemporary radical liberal puritanism.
Puritanism in the sense of absolute iron certainties, coupled with a fear of being ostracised and/or subjected to public humiliation for failing to demonstrate an adequate level of virtue.
This has happened before:
•the debauchery of the Roman Republic followed by the neo-moral culture of Augustus reign.
• the collapse of the Pagan ethnical-religious system and effective governance followed by the Christianisation of the Roman Empire
• the corruption of monasticism and clerical standards followed by the Reformation and Counter-Reformation
• the C18th high baroque era of elite self indulgence (and the emergence of industrial scale slavery) followed by C19th revivalist Christian moral crusades and abolitionism.
None of these movements were uncontested, and none were wholly successful in terms of their aims.
All of them, with the benefit of hindsight, can be seen to have had a false sense of their own inevitable and necessary absolute victory.
But, they all had an advantage over the current iteration of the theme: higher birth rates and shorter life spans: allowing the young radicals greater relative leeway to achieve their broad objectives.
In summation I think we could all, regardless of our position on the contested issues of the day benefit from taking a deep breath, a pause for thought, and treading carefully.
Lest we trample each other’s virtues into the mire.
I’d just like to add to make my thoughts more relevant to your concerns that these type of long, slow-burn cultural shifts are utterly terrifying for people who identify with the disintegrating order, or with the disintegration as an end point in itself: this can lead to poor decision making when it comes to casting ballots in elections, and primaries such as your countries political system has.
Sorry I can’t offer anything more than a sorrowful dissection of how I see it.