Karamazov wrote:
I know I fell foul of both reason 3 and 4 for most of my twenties: but without knowing specifics about each instance can’t know why in the OP’s case.
We're only going to read the OP's side of the story, anyway. So that's why speaking in general terms is probably best.
It's sad how most employers insist on "At Will" hiring -- they don't have to tell employees why they're being sacked, only that they are being sacked.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.