“Free Speech” protest attacked, canceled in Frisco

Post Reply New Topic

Free speech is the enemy of communistic system, but is the fuel which makes capitalist system thrive.

I think there's a fine line between free speech and hate speech, but the alt right has blurred that line.

Hate speech and free speech are different subjects.

The opposite to free speech is a communistic form of governing system. Communism has been introduced into the USA, UK and European schools for a while. It came into the UK when they brought in the then new GCSE system and with it out went physical punishment and in came brainwashed reasoning.

Take a look at this. (If you have time I will also provide a longer link to watch. The shorter one is just a small part of it).




https://youtu.be/IOY4jRSpzkM




https://youtu.be/ldkAuUgSjdQ

There are many parallels between the battles between the "hard hats" and the "hippies" in the 1960s....and the "alt-right" and "BLM/Antifa" these days.

Both "right wingers" and "progressives" protest peacefully for the most part; but there are fringe elements within both groups who are really not all that peaceful.

Free Speech = the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.

There are exceptions, for example, is a person is a member of a group that is classified as a terrorist group.
In the UK, the racist organisation National Action is now regarded as a terrorist organisation due to some of their members involvement in the organised murder of a member of parliament.

A number of people since have been put in prison for their involvement in the organisation including at least one member of the British Police Force and at least one member of the British Army.

The reason why racists gravitate towards conservative / republican party is due to the political values that these parties promote. Such people also often reject the political values of the leftist parties, although interestingly enough, during the rise of the original nazi's pre-second world war, Hitler and his buddies were on both sides of the fence of politics, until the night of the long knives which the more right wing members of the nazi party did away with all the people who were more liberal.

Apparently, according to speculation, Hitler ordered this execution of his buddies who helped the Nazi party rise to power, as Hitler started to fear the power of those who were strong in the brown shirts, but also, to unify the political aims of the nazi party. If there was no diversity within his own party, then it would be much more robust as a party.

Apparently some of the people who were murdered during this night, were good friends of Hitler.
I guess Hitler and his far right buddies just used the brown shirts to help him rise against the opposition, and once they had achieved their goals, they did away with those who helped them gain power.

So yes, being a conservative or republican does not automatically make a person racist or a nazi.
I believe there are loads of people who belong to these parties as well as loads of people who support / vote for these parties who are not racist and who do not hold nazi like values.

There are some, however who do. After all, Nazism is a form of fascism, and fascism is a form of totalitarian government. Conservative and Republican's are political parties and not a type of government.

How the government is organised determines as to whether the government is more democratic or more totalitarian.

Interestingly enough, many of the communist governments in our history have been more totalitarian than democratic forms of governments.

I found such an observations ironic, as in some cases, both the fascists and the communists want to run the population by placing a dictator or party of dictators to enforce a totalitarian control over the masses, with out the masses having any freedom or say in the choices made for them which affect all the governed populations lives.

In totalitarian governments, which includes nazi fascist governments and most realised communist governments, freedom of speech is not a right, and in many cases, if one speaks out against the manner in which the totalitarian government does business, the consequences can be fatal.

This is in interesting observation, as those alt-right who use the freedom of speech as a defence to air their opinion on their racist and prejudiced values, if their vision was realised, they would likely find they lose their freedom of speech, due to the totalitarian nature of the government that they wished for.

It would certainly be ironic if such a scenario were to be realised and the people who fought for such a government were the among the people who lost their right, because they were not among the elite ruling class / master race.

Yes, how ironic. I see the funny side in such a realisation.

btw, did anyone read the article about the Fred Perry brand taking off the market their black and yellow t-shirts due to being adopted by the Proud Boys.

What i also found ironic, is that Fred Perry was the son of a UK socialist MP, who was a tennis champ, who started his clothing business by going into a partnership with a Jewish businessman who was friend of his.

How ironic, all these racist neo's turning out to be wearing clothing made by a Jewish man. lol.

Ironically, the original trend for wearing Fred Perry's came from the Moonstomp skin head movement during the 60s.
Moonstomp skin heads were not racist but a movement of Jamaican reggae and ska lovers and party goers.

This UK movement started their own fashion trend which copied the Jamaican fashions of the time.
The UK neo's / alt right of their time, hijacked the fashion (as they do with other popular trends)
and used it to infiltrate the movement and do their best to convert those within the movement that they saw as fit for purpose.

San Francisco is a craphole anyway! Insane rent costs for a mediocre apartment. Bums, Druggies, Car Break-ins, with no end in sight. People are leaving in droves...