ironpony wrote:
But how so? For example:
The character who kills himself at the end accidentally... He could have just done that from being drunk. He didn't need to run away from a right, and get a girl pregnant to push him into doing that. The other guys went out on the bridge, without needing those things happening to them, so why did he have to, in order for him to go with them?
Are you objecting to the accidental suicide itself or to the inclusion of what you believe to be an irrelevant event in the movie?
It was necessary to show the meaninglessness of that character's ambitions, the futility of trying to hold on to one's dreams in that social environment, and the way that the actions of the few have an impact on the lives of the many.
I know this is deep thinking, but try not to obsess over it.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
23 Nov 2020, 4:44 pm
