Misinformation Spread by Social Media
Researchers have developed tools to study the cognitive, societal and algorithmic biases that help fake news spread
Social media are among the primary sources of news in the U.S. and across the world. Yet users are exposed to content of questionable accuracy, including conspiracy theories, clickbait, hyperpartisan content, pseudo science and even fabricated “fake news” reports.
It’s not surprising that there’s so much disinformation published: Spam and online fraud are lucrative for criminals, and government and political propaganda yield both partisan and financial benefits. But the fact that low-credibility content spreads so quickly and easily suggests that people and the algorithms behind social media platforms are vulnerable to manipulation.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... ial-media/
The danger is that if a scientific "Truth" is later found out to be a fabricated lie, does this mean that those who spoke the truth in the past and were labelled as "Conspiracy theorists" will be vindicated?
And what is to stop this developing into communism where the only percieved views allowed are the communistic ones and no one is allowed to think or believe outside it?
While I can understand the articles point of view, I for one have to defend the freedom of speech and thought because thinking outside the box is what I do. I was told it was an autistic trait to think outside the box, but going by views on this site in the past and a few in the present, I am not so sure.
(I am not wanting to prevent anyone from speaking out and saying I am wrong as I will defend your right to say this, even if I am not happy to be told I am wrong, as this is what I want to defend. The freedom of speech and thought. The freedom to not end up like pre-programmed communistic zombies).
_________________
Verifying you are human. This may take a few seconds...
threetoed snail
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: 13 Apr 2021
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 183
Location: landmass surrounded by oceans
"OSoMe"... That's how you know the people behind the study are real nerds.
I think this timeless classic by CGP Grey on the subject is an appropriate addition here:
And what is to stop this developing into communism where the only percieved views allowed are the communistic ones and no one is allowed to think or believe outside it?
While I can understand the articles point of view, I for one have to defend the freedom of speech and thought because thinking outside the box is what I do. I was told it was an autistic trait to think outside the box, but going by views on this site in the past and a few in the present, I am not so sure.
(I am not wanting to prevent anyone from speaking out and saying I am wrong as I will defend your right to say this, even if I am not happy to be told I am wrong, as this is what I want to defend. The freedom of speech and thought. The freedom to not end up like pre-programmed communistic zombies).
I don't understand the connection between the article and any of what you're saying.
_________________
lorem ipsum
Fixed it =)
_________________
I'll brave the storm to come, for it surely looks like rain...
"You can't trust social media!"
Where'd you hear that?
"On social media!"
But you said you can't trust social media...
"Only MY social media is true! The REST are fake!"
"You can't trust the news!"
Where'd you hear that?
"On this news outlet!"
But you said you can't trust the news...
"You can trust MY news, but all the OTHER news is fake!"
"You can't trust the government!"
Where'd you hear that?
"My elected officials!"
But you said you can't trust the government...
"You can trust MY people, but anyone else is untrustworthy!"
Or the musical chairs version:
"You can't trust social media!"
Says who?
"The news!" / "You can't trust the news!"
Says who?
"Politicians!" / "You can't trust politicians!"
Says who?
"Social media!"
So who should we listen to?
"ME."
Why?
"Because of this thing I read on social media about a news article talking about something a politician said!"
![]()
threetoed snail
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: 13 Apr 2021
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 183
Location: landmass surrounded by oceans
22/03/2021|4min
If Donald Trump does start his own social media platform it will be "an awful lot of fun," according to Sky News contributor Daisy Cousens.
"This is so exciting," she told Sky News host Andrew Bolt.
It comes after reports emerged on Monday that Donald Trump is set for a social media comeback, with plans to launch his own platform in two-to-three-months time.
Earlier in the year, Donald Trump's accounts were banned by both Twitter and Facebook.
Ms Cousens said Donald Trump "is the king of social media".
"Fingers crossed this happens."
https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_624 ... 20%20share
_________________
lorem ipsum
And why is critical thinking important?
First of all, that’s what almost every employer seeks.
Secondly, in the era of fake news, contrasting data, and so much information to process every day, critical thinking is the only way to make sense of the world.
What Is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking is the ability to think in an organized and rational manner in order to understand connections between ideas and/or facts. It helps you decide what to believe in. In other words, it’s “thinking about thinking”—identifying, analyzing, and then fixing flaws in the way we think.
How to Be a Critical Thinker?
To become one takes time, practice, and patience. But something you can start doing today to improve your critical thinking skills is apply the 7 steps of critical thinking to every problem you tackle—either at work or in your everyday life.
Plus, there are some critical thinking questions to help you out at each of the steps.
https://zety.com/blog/critical-thinking-skills
threetoed snail
Pileated woodpecker
Joined: 13 Apr 2021
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 183
Location: landmass surrounded by oceans
Jump to navigationJump to search
Contents
1 English
1.1 Etymology
1.2 Verb
1.2.1 See also
1.2.1.1 Translations
English
Etymology
This order first appeared in John Selden's Table-Talk (c. 1654): "Preachers say, 'Do as I say, not as I do.'"
Verb
do as I say and not as I do (third-person singular simple present does as I say and not as I do, present participle doing as I say and not as I do, simple past did as I said and not as I did, past participle done as I said and not as I did)
(as imperative) Do not imitate my behavior but obey my instructions.
See also
hypocrisy
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/do_as_I_ ... ot_as_I_do
_________________
lorem ipsum
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| QU bout social cues vs social-emotional reciprocity |
10 Jul 2026, 9:22 am |
