Lecturer At Yale Event Fantasizes About Murdering Whites
The goal of CRT in the western world is ultimately to make itself redundant.
From what I have seen, the proponents of CRT are mainly those seeking an "acceptable" way in which to perpetuate racism, either:
From weaponising race against sections of the population in order to provide a sense of "moral superiority", OR
Through working to antagonise that section of the population so far that it instigates the type of "racism" (which those people did not have prior to CRT acolytes pushing CRT on them) required to "justify" CRT - A form of bullying, with the intention being to have the target "lash out", which will then be used as "evidence" to suport the initial bullying:
Source: https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/commission-general/what-bullying-violence-harassment-and-bullying-fact-sheet
I actually think most training in CRT is intended to increase cross-cultural knowledge, reduce prejudice which leads to a reduction in discrimination in the real world. I fail to see how that is intended to bully anyone other than those who wish to resist learning anything to do with POCs.
The goal of CRT in the western world is ultimately to make itself redundant.
From what I have seen, the proponents of CRT are mainly those seeking an "acceptable" way in which to perpetuate racism, either:
From weaponising race against sections of the population in order to provide a sense of "moral superiority", OR
Through working to antagonise that section of the population so far that it instigates the type of "racism" (which those people did not have prior to CRT acolytes pushing CRT on them) required to "justify" CRT - A form of bullying, with the intention being to have the target "lash out", which will then be used as "evidence" to suport the initial bullying:
Source: https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/commission-general/what-bullying-violence-harassment-and-bullying-fact-sheet
I actually think most training in CRT is intended to increase cross-cultural knowledge, reduce prejudice which leads to a reduction in discrimination in the real world. I fail to see how that is intended to bully anyone other than those who wish to resist learning anything to do with POCs.
Tell a person they are worthless enough times (despite evidence to the contrary), and they will come to believe this, and act in that manner. Similarly, tell a person they are inherently racist enough times and they are likely to decide that if that is what is expected of them, they should take on that behaviour.
I will say, it is interesting (and quite hypocritical) to have "racial prejudice" explained to me by a person with a predilection for weaponising race to demean others\their message...
I should warn you Brictoria you are drifting into personal attacks again (and not for the first time) when all I am trying my best to focus on the topic of the thread.
It's my guess you are trying to bait me (once again) in a bid to lock this thread because you can't come up with any valid counter-arguments.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,478
Location: Long Island, New York
The problem with a lot of these trainings is not the effort to redress historical and current racism, it is how they are trying to redress it, as been pointed out by perpetuating negative racist stereotypes.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
(sarcasm)
Two words don’t make a right is a statement born of systematic racism. Me writing that is proof of my racism. I only said that because I am ignorant of my white privilege. Or maybe it is just my white fragility.
And that part about CRT redressing racism the wrong way, Whitesplaining, grounds for cancelation.
Mandatory CRT and Anti Racism training for me. I am a serious case I am a candidate for the new experimental ABA driven anti racism training
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
It is Autism Acceptance Month
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
I haven’t benefited from looking poor and autistic. Both have caused me problems.
There's benefit in everything.
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
(sarcasm)
Two words don’t make a right is a statement born of systematic racism. Me writing that is proof of my racism. I only said that because I am ignorant of my white privilege. Or maybe it is just my white fragility.
I should point out that there's multiple forms of anti-racism training. I've worked in institutions that have "Learning Asian names" which is an actual module to help Australians pronounce Asian names to not cause offence.
Even for me (having lived in Asia) I have no hope of correctly pronouncing all types of names ranging from Greek, Spanish, Chinese all the way to Arabic. I'm not bad with Indian names though.
I'm hopeless with gender pronouns.
Everything is a work in progress. Even those of us who are "woke"
Tell a person they are worthless enough times (despite evidence to the contrary), and they will come to believe this, and act in that manner. Similarly, tell a person they are inherently racist enough times and they are likely to decide that if that is what is expected of them, they should take on that behaviour.
I will say, it is interesting (and quite hypocritical) to have "racial prejudice" explained to me by a person with a predilection for weaponising race to demean others\their message...
If you lack self-confidence, and I don't.
I just dismiss foolish people playing political one-upmanship rather than focusing on the Truth.
Generally, I don't even read their posts.
Tell a person they are worthless enough times (despite evidence to the contrary), and they will come to believe this, and act in that manner. Similarly, tell a person they are inherently racist enough times and they are likely to decide that if that is what is expected of them, they should take on that behaviour.
I will say, it is interesting (and quite hypocritical) to have "racial prejudice" explained to me by a person with a predilection for weaponising race to demean others\their message...
If you lack self-confidence, and I don't.
They only need a small number - even one example can be enough for them to justify their actions to themselves.
The wider they throw their net ("all white people are inherently racist", for example), the greater the pool of prospective "converts" they have who could potentially change from ignoring another's race to becoming hostile to it merely because they were repeatedly informed it was something "expected of them".
Then there's also the other side of the coin where those who are not "white" (or "white aligned" - the recent dog-whistle used to isolate inconvenient portions of the "non-white" community in order to persecute their race under the guise of "anti-racism") who are continually led to believe that every "white" (or "white aligned") person is racist, and as such are convinced that they need to react to those people as though they are inevitably hostile to themselves, furthering racial distrust\division, rather than (as they claim is their intention) working to remove it.
Generally, I don't even read their posts.
True... I just find that ensuring other potential readers are aware of pertinent facts and can verify the biases behind sources, in order to make informed judgments on what they read, to be of assistance to the wider community.
Consider it (for example) the difference between someone subjectively claiming another person (or their actions) is "racist", compared to providing evidence of the person's objectively racist words\actions\beliefs - With the former, there's no way to determine how the person came to that decision, or if there were some hypocritical stance\nefarious purpose behind the claim, whereas in the latter, the reader can look at the sources and see whether there is substance to the assertion, or see the hypocritical stance\nefarious purpose behind the false\questionable claim.
It would appear the good doctor has been cancelled
https://meaww.com/aruna-khilanani-fired ... y-hospital
Interesting how those in the American media whose primary purpose is the defence of the 1st amendment when it comes to bashing minority groups are suddenly doing the very thing they claim to be defending against?.
The hypocrisy and double standards practiced by those defending the conservative right is amusing.
https://meaww.com/aruna-khilanani-fired ... y-hospital
Interesting how those in the American media whose primary purpose is the defence of the 1st amendment when it comes to bashing minority groups are suddenly doing the very thing they claim to be defending against?.
The hypocrisy and double standards practiced by those defending the conservative right is amusing.
Encouraging injury or murder of another person that might incite violence is not covered by the 1st amendment.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 25,516
Location: Right over your left shoulder
https://meaww.com/aruna-khilanani-fired ... y-hospital
Interesting how those in the American media whose primary purpose is the defence of the 1st amendment when it comes to bashing minority groups are suddenly doing the very thing they claim to be defending against?.
The hypocrisy and double standards practiced by those defending the conservative right is amusing.
Encouraging injury or murder of another person that might incite violence is not covered by the 1st amendment.
Neither is how your private employer reacts (unless you've got tenure).
_________________
Watching liberals try to solve societal problems without a systemic critique/class consciousness is like watching someone in the dark try to flip on the light switch, but they keep turning on the garbage disposal instead.
戦争ではなく戦争と戦う