FBI Thwart wing terrorists from attacking civilians
Brictoria wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Source: https://ground.news/interest/buzzfeed-news
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed-news/
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed-news/
I'd be very slighty centre left
No one, and I repeat, no one would consider him a left-wing moderate.
This is simply an observation.
There are years of evidence supporting this.
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Source: https://ground.news/interest/buzzfeed-news
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed-news/
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed-news/
I'd be very slighty centre left
No one, and I repeat, no one would consider him a left-wing moderate.
This is simply an observation.
There are years of evidence supporting this.
Well I suppose, technically, there was no indication from which direction the "slightly centre" portion came from...
cyberdad wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Calling a fact a lie does not make it a lie either.
Classic obfuscation. The FBI thwarted right wing terrorists and the usual suspects are trying to make everyone gorge themselves in pickled red herrings to avoid stating the FBI saved lives from MAGAs with white supremacist affiliations.
Hillary Clinton has a higher body count than any so called "Right Wing" terrorist group.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Calling a fact a lie does not make it a lie either.
Classic obfuscation. The FBI thwarted right wing terrorists and the usual suspects are trying to make everyone gorge themselves in pickled red herrings to avoid stating the FBI saved lives from MAGAs with white supremacist affiliations._________________
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,795
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Those on this forum suggesting that these fanatics are only being "persecuted" for their beliefs are showing their hand, based solely out of sympathy for the far right.
Interesting: I hadn't seen anyone on this forum making that suggestion - could you provide some indication of the posts which do this?
WP is a straw man factory. lol
Whenever I ask for evidence, via a simple cut & paste, it is never forthcoming.
Quite telling.
@ Kraichgauer.
Could you cut & paste where people have indicated what you are postulating?
I don't cut and paste.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,795
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Calling a fact a lie does not make it a lie either.
Classic obfuscation. The FBI thwarted right wing terrorists and the usual suspects are trying to make everyone gorge themselves in pickled red herrings to avoid stating the FBI saved lives from MAGAs with white supremacist affiliations.
Hillary Clinton has a higher body count than any so called "Right Wing" terrorist group.
Huh? Does she have the bodies of a bunch of boys and young men buried under her house that only you know about?
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Brictoria wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Source: https://ground.news/interest/buzzfeed-news
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed-news/
Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/buzzfeed-news/
I'd be very slighty centre left
No one, and I repeat, no one would consider him a left-wing moderate.
This is simply an observation.
There are years of evidence supporting this.
Well I suppose, technically, there was no indication from which direction the "slightly centre" portion came from...
Most people would interpret the term differently.
Over the decade, I can't recall one post/thread, by him, that was supportive of a conservative idea, using a political context.
Someone, anyone, please prove me wrong.
It suggests someone who follows a narrative, rather than independent thought.
It is a simple, verifiable Truth that he has a heavily left-wing ideology, to the point of hyperpartisanship, *IMO*.
This is coming from a man who accuses *me* of hyperpartisanship.
"Projection", perhaps?
A simple observation politely voiced in my own defense.
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Those on this forum suggesting that these fanatics are only being "persecuted" for their beliefs are showing their hand, based solely out of sympathy for the far right.
Interesting: I hadn't seen anyone on this forum making that suggestion - could you provide some indication of the posts which do this?
WP is a straw man factory. lol
Whenever I ask for evidence, via a simple cut & paste, it is never forthcoming.
Quite telling.
@ Kraichgauer.
Could you cut & paste where people have indicated what you are postulating?
I don't cut and paste.
Are you saying: "You cut and run", instead?
I still luv you, btw.
Brictoria wrote:
As a side note regarding sources: I'd suggest looking at the site "ground.news" as it allows you to find articles on news items as reported across the political spectrum, which can help avoid the hyperpartisans who insist certain sources from the other end of the political spectrum to themselves are "propoganda", "fake news", "biased", etc.. It's also quite useful in evaluating the information each side receives (or, equally importantly, is not provided), to get a better understanding of each side's perspective on various situations.
missed your reply till now, thanks, ill check it out - since I tend to inform myself by topic rather than what is hot at the time via news cycle, I tend to end up doing that balancing act naturally.
I do see how the tool may speed up the search if it is any good.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,795
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Those on this forum suggesting that these fanatics are only being "persecuted" for their beliefs are showing their hand, based solely out of sympathy for the far right.
Interesting: I hadn't seen anyone on this forum making that suggestion - could you provide some indication of the posts which do this?
WP is a straw man factory. lol
Whenever I ask for evidence, via a simple cut & paste, it is never forthcoming.
Quite telling.
@ Kraichgauer.
Could you cut & paste where people have indicated what you are postulating?
I don't cut and paste.
Are you saying: "You cut and run", instead?
I still luv you, btw.
Nope, just state the facts as I see 'em.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Those on this forum suggesting that these fanatics are only being "persecuted" for their beliefs are showing their hand, based solely out of sympathy for the far right.
Interesting: I hadn't seen anyone on this forum making that suggestion - could you provide some indication of the posts which do this?
WP is a straw man factory. lol
Whenever I ask for evidence, via a simple cut & paste, it is never forthcoming.
Quite telling.
@ Kraichgauer.
Could you cut & paste where people have indicated what you are postulating?
I don't cut and paste.
Are you saying: "You cut and run", instead?
I still luv you, btw.
Nope, just state the facts as I see 'em.
Try my non-partisan, non-binary glasses.
The world has a completely different hue.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 47,795
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Those on this forum suggesting that these fanatics are only being "persecuted" for their beliefs are showing their hand, based solely out of sympathy for the far right.
Interesting: I hadn't seen anyone on this forum making that suggestion - could you provide some indication of the posts which do this?
WP is a straw man factory. lol
Whenever I ask for evidence, via a simple cut & paste, it is never forthcoming.
Quite telling.
@ Kraichgauer.
Could you cut & paste where people have indicated what you are postulating?
I don't cut and paste.
Are you saying: "You cut and run", instead?
I still luv you, btw.
Nope, just state the facts as I see 'em.
Try my non-partisan, non-binary glasses.
The world has a completely different hue.
Your glasses veer to the right, whether you know it or not.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Mr Reynholm wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Mr Reynholm wrote:
Calling a fact a lie does not make it a lie either.
Classic obfuscation. The FBI thwarted right wing terrorists and the usual suspects are trying to make everyone gorge themselves in pickled red herrings to avoid stating the FBI saved lives from MAGAs with white supremacist affiliations.
Hillary Clinton has a higher body count than any so called "Right Wing" terrorist group.
umm you are getting so far from the original topic of this thread, you may as well be metaphorically in Timbuktu.
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Those on this forum suggesting that these fanatics are only being "persecuted" for their beliefs are showing their hand, based solely out of sympathy for the far right.
Interesting: I hadn't seen anyone on this forum making that suggestion - could you provide some indication of the posts which do this?
WP is a straw man factory. lol
Whenever I ask for evidence, via a simple cut & paste, it is never forthcoming.
Quite telling.
@ Kraichgauer.
Could you cut & paste where people have indicated what you are postulating?
I don't cut and paste.
Are you saying: "You cut and run", instead?
I still luv you, btw.
Nope, just state the facts as I see 'em.
Try my non-partisan, non-binary glasses.
The world has a completely different hue.
Your glasses veer to the right, whether you know it or not.
You do know what the definition of partisan is, right?
Quote:
adjective
adjective
prejudiced in favour of a particular cause.
adjective
prejudiced in favour of a particular cause.
My loyalty is to the Truth, not the ramblings of some old dude with his/her ideology.
To think I would adopt every aspect of someone else's life/political view would be laughable and embarrassing.
I have never denied I have a greater affinity for right-wing politics, but I am a moderate, and definitely not partisan, let alone hyperpartisan.
I will never embrace a woke cultural norm where "morality" is more important than the facts/Truth.
That is a given, so it is the right, as a default.
I focus on uncovering the Truth no matter where that may be, rather than servicing a political narrative with its inherent conflicts and hypocrisy.
While there are appalling aspects of right-wing politics, it is generally more rational and practical and not into sanctimony and virtual signalling.
In a nutshell, I didn't find moderate right-wing politics.
Moderate right-wing politics found me.
cyberdad wrote:
Pepe wrote:
In a nutshell, I didn't find moderate right-wing politics.
Moderate right-wing politics found me.
Moderate right-wing politics found me.
Well at least your being honest now.
Now?
That has been know since at least early 2018:
Pepe wrote:
I am a moderate conservative in many areas, though I consider myself outside the political labelling system...
So I don't mind having a lefty mascot or two...
So I don't mind having a lefty mascot or two...
https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=359668&p=7812625#p7812625
You may want to consider doing a little research (It isn't hard) before posting claims which are so easily shown to be false - it only took a couple of seconds to find the above quote, for example.