uncommondenominator wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Has anyone researched genuine concerns about vaccination?
To suggest *everyone* has only irrational reasons is a binary.
There was a moral issue for some people, as an example.
The article is literally about eating borax to "kill nanomachines" and eating epsom salt and baking soda to "absorb radiation".
Sounds irrational to me
You got me.
My aim is to try to mitigate the "Hatefest" that is a problem on this website.
"Hate begets hate."
uncommondenominator wrote:
Pepe wrote:
cyberdad wrote:
Some of Our local Australian anti-vaxxers are threatening ministers
This photo is only a few hours old.
Fixed it.
A fine solution to a problem that didn't exist. They are anti-vaxxers. They are threatening officials. Therefore, antivaxxers are threatening officials. You mighta had a point if it said ALL antivaxxers did, or that antivaxxers UNIVERSALLY did - quite literally, without getting into potentially subjective and biased words like "many" or "some" or "few", which may be construed as misleading to imply more or less, it simply states, clearly, that "anti-vaxxers threatened officials", meaning that people threatened officials, and those people were anti-vaxxers, without potentially skewing the issue by getting into how "many" or "few" there are.
I'm surprised that someone so incredibly impartial and unbiased didn't pick up on that, and felt the need to editorialize things.
Now that I have explained where I am coming from, you should no longer be "surprised".
Your suggestion that I am not being impartial is now null and void, as you can see.
I do try to see both sides of the "equation".
I have a problem with hyperpartisanship.