Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ]
28 Nov 2021, 2:14 am
28 Nov 2021, 3:01 am
yeah 
, let's protect the shills
28 Nov 2021, 3:20 am
traven wrote:
yeah , let's protect the shills
, let's protect the shills"Please explain."
28 Nov 2021, 3:35 am
28 Nov 2021, 1:55 pm
Dox47 wrote:
This won't end badly.
Most of the bad behaviour is the result of anonymity.
I think this assessment is self-evident.
I am in favour of curbing bad behaviour online.
I am not in favour of inhibiting freedom of expression via diversity of thought, however.
28 Nov 2021, 3:01 pm
29 Nov 2021, 3:14 am
29 Nov 2021, 3:25 am
^ The sort of trolling the Prime Minister of Australia is focusing on is bullying, potentially resulting in the deaths of particularly young people.
I am in favour of holding psychopaths and sociopaths to account.
29 Nov 2021, 4:10 am
Pepe wrote:
^ The sort of trolling the Prime Minister of Australia is focusing on is bullying, potentially resulting in the deaths of particularly young people.
I am in favour of holding psychopaths and sociopaths to account.
I am in favour of holding psychopaths and sociopaths to account.
Eh, I'm telling you, this is the kind of thing where good intentions lead to bad results, I think if it passed Australia would just have to become a sort of internet dead-zone, as no one could afford the liability of operating there. Imagine what this place would be like if Alex could be sued every time someone said their feelings got hurt; he'd either shut it down, or have it so heavily moderated that anything more stimulating than a lolcat meme would draw an instant ban, it's just not a workable way to run anything on the internet. There's also the technical side, in that you'd need to build in the capability to identify specific individuals, which would be highly prone to abuse by various authorities, and not just in Australia.
29 Nov 2021, 4:52 am
Dox47 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
^ The sort of trolling the Prime Minister of Australia is focusing on is bullying, potentially resulting in the deaths of particularly young people.
I am in favour of holding psychopaths and sociopaths to account.
I am in favour of holding psychopaths and sociopaths to account.
Eh, I'm telling you, this is the kind of thing where good intentions lead to bad results, I think if it passed Australia would just have to become a sort of internet dead-zone, as no one could afford the liability of operating there. Imagine what this place would be like if Alex could be sued every time someone said their feelings got hurt; he'd either shut it down, or have it so heavily moderated that anything more stimulating than a lolcat meme would draw an instant ban, it's just not a workable way to run anything on the internet. There's also the technical side, in that you'd need to build in the capability to identify specific individuals, which would be highly prone to abuse by various authorities, and not just in Australia.
You would have to prove malice.
If there wasn't malice, no problem.
BTW, Why is civil behaviour a problem?
Personal attacks aren't allowed on this website either.
I think the focus is on platforms such as twitter.
Page 1 of 1 [ 10 posts ]
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Online Behaviour - Pet Peeves |
18 Jun 2025, 7:03 am |
| Teaser Trailer For 2025's "The Running Man" Now Online! |
03 Jul 2025, 1:54 am |
