The inflation reduction act, negotiation and the briar patch

Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 

TenMinutes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Feb 2021
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,023

03 Jan 2023, 1:46 am



Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Texas

03 Jan 2023, 11:46 am

I think the inflation reduction act is silly because Congress thought they could bring inflation under control by printing even more money through the Federal Reserve in the Inflation Reduction Act.At least that was the impression by accountant friend had.



The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

03 Jan 2023, 3:22 pm

Texasmoneyman300 wrote:
I think the inflation reduction act is silly because Congress thought they could bring inflation under control by printing even more money through the Federal Reserve in the Inflation Reduction Act.At least that was the impression by accountant friend had.

The Federal Reserve is independent of Congress and sets its own levels of "money printing".

The IRA (unfortunate acronym) probably won't lead to more money printing. It's also not clear to me whether it will reduce inflation. In theory it should lead to a smaller government deficit, which should reduce inflation as money is taken out of the economy. But whether this balances out the effect that new taxes will have on prices, or the simultaneous injection of demand by spending on energy, is unclear.

The joint negotiation of drug prices is genuinely clever and should have been done a long time ago.



Texasmoneyman300
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Texas

03 Jan 2023, 3:42 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Texasmoneyman300 wrote:
I think the inflation reduction act is silly because Congress thought they could bring inflation under control by printing even more money through the Federal Reserve in the Inflation Reduction Act.At least that was the impression by accountant friend had.

The Federal Reserve is independent of Congress and sets its own levels of "money printing".

The IRA (unfortunate acronym) probably won't lead to more money printing. It's also not clear to me whether it will reduce inflation. In theory it should lead to a smaller government deficit, which should reduce inflation as money is taken out of the economy. But whether this balances out the effect that new taxes will have on prices, or the simultaneous injection of demand by spending on energy, is unclear.

The joint negotiation of drug prices is genuinely clever and should have been done a long time ago.

I am well aware that the Fed is not part of the federal government,.I was not implying that it was.Thats why I said"through the Federal Reserve"