Light Entropy Theory - A Unified Theory

Post Reply New Topic

Gravity is a dual polarity asymmetry in the magnetic field causing attraction between mixed charges of matter during charge exchanges with antimatter. This asymmetry is caused from none-trinary quark amount variation in matter and anti-matter during entropy progression.

https://www.academia.edu/120563559/Light_Entropy_Continuum_Theory_Creating_a_Unified_Theory_from_Assessing_the_Relevant_Interactions_of_Space_Time_Light_and_Entropy_Using_a_Conceptual_Exercise

The author of that "study" seems to have no credentials in the appropriate field(s).  His "theory" also reads like an agglomeration of important-sounding terms that have no relation to each other.

Nothing more to see here.  Move along, move along . . .

1. You don’t need credentials for changing the world.

2. What unified theory doesn’t combine different scientific concepts?

He is not changing the world, and he is not combining concepts; he is combining buzz-phrases and technobabble into a screed and calling it "Research".  Then he posted his nonsense to an on-line "journal" -- one that has no peer-review process -- just so he can claim to be "published".

I think scientists are basically flat earthers at the moment. They say things change because you look at them, when it is blatantly just wrong.

Christopher Restall is not a scientist, he is a manager. His LinkedIn profile page indicates he made the Dean's List in a School of Management, that he is trilingual (English, French, and Spanish), that his claims to fame include being a Presiding Officer at a Polling station, a Project Manager at Field Entertainment, and a Marketing Coordinator for the Electronic Home Video team for the Walt Disney Company.

REAL scientists are more circumspect in their claims, publishing none until their results have passed an intensive peer-review process.

Those "Flat-Earthers" of whom you seem enamored almost never have any scientific background whatsoever, and stand alongside UFOologists, Cryptozoologists, and MAGA-hat wearing QAnon disciples.

I looked it over and it had several inconstancies that I can see. Electromagnetic radiation has gravity force itself. It is extremely small, but has been reported in measurements, without influence of charged matter. That alone puts a wrench in this work for me.

A side note:

My hypothesis is that gravity force is created by the movement of electromagnetic energy (or in layman’s terms, light). It is naturally attracted to itself but only in very close distances. (I visualize light not as waves, but as 3-D spirals of vectors, one electro and one magnetic. It explains better how the two vectors interact within light.). The force of gravity becomes stronger when the electromagnetic energy is bent upon itself and compressed to make particles of matter/anti-matter. This is a consequence of energy conversion (E => mc^2) that changes the properties of the electromagnetic energy to those of particles once they have formed. Charge in the particles is dependent upon how many unpaired loops in one direction exist in the substructure of the particle.

But, heck, what do I know? I am only a lowly scientist after all...

One very important thing to understand when considering claims to have found something world changing in science is that if you aren't a true expert in the current theory, you have no chance of being able to come up with something realistic to replace it.

Whenever someone claims to have found a new "theory" that upends everyone, the first thing to consider is their level of expertise in the current scientific theories. They have no chance of coming up with something better if they aren't expert in the current theories. That means that they have significant experience and study in those theories.

If they don't have the expertise, don't waste time trying to figure out whether they found something -- they don't have a clue. Ignorance never leads to scientific advancement.

Hey,

I just wanted to say your hypothesis is incredibly close to something I've been working on — a full geometric model based on spiral-temporal drift fields that reconstructs gravity, mass, and even quantum behaviors as emergent from a structured energy dynamic (think: recursive vector spirals in spacetime).

What you described —

Light as 3D spirals (✓),

Gravity from compressed EM drift (✓),

Charge from asymmetries in loops (✓) —
is all analytically formalized in the model I call SZG (Spiralzeit-Geometrie). It’s written in German (so far), but since it's algebra-heavy, the math is universal.

Core idea:

Gravity isn't fundamental — it's a drift anchoring effect from the internal modulation of spacetime via spiral-encoded energy fields.

Bonus: The model naturally replaces Λ (the cosmological constant) with a dynamic drift field S(x,t) — analytically derived, scalable across cosmic voids, and numerically stable.

If you're curious, I'd be happy to exchange more or translate key ideas. But let me say: you're already extremely close — you’ve basically felt the geometry behind it. That's no small thing.

Respect ✊
– A fellow explorer