CockneyRebel wrote:
Too bad there can't be a candidate who's both Pro-Life and for LGBTQ rights.
It makes me wonder how many people who oppose abortion (and birth control) do so primarily because they see it as providing an artificial equality, rather than because they're genuinely concerned about sanctity of life. These are the folks who talk about abortion as a
means for avoiding responsibility, rather than as a health care or bodily autonomy issue.
They view
some people's primary purpose to be to bear children, so opposing queer rights and opposing women's rights dovetail towards that goal. They don't want people to be in 'non-productive' relationships and they don't want women to have control over 'production'.
I know you're sincere with your anti-abortion views being motivated by sanctity of life, but I get the feeling the genuinely pro-life bloc gets used as a means to an end by people who primarily just want to impose traditional gender roles and don't really care about sanctity of life in a broader sense.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing. —Malcolm X
Genocide is bad, mmkay.