Mona Pereth wrote:
Honey69 wrote:
https://www.myheraldreview.com/news/lifestyle/less-burnout-more-babies-how-conservatives-are-winning-young-women/article_df83983c-85da-42b4-8704-55bfd84abc97.html
And just where do these young women think they are going to find men who can afford to support them???
Back in the 1950's, here in the U.S.A., the kind of family life that conservatives are so nostalgic for was enabled, to a large degree, by tax policies that "conservatives" are
not at all nostalgic for. There were very high (super-extremely high, by today's standards) taxes on the rich, enabling the government to invest in massive infrastructure projects that created lots of good jobs, both directly and indirectly.
Also back then, labor unions were strong -- another enabling factor that most "conservatives" are
not at all nostalgic for.
In earlier eras, working-class housewives were supported by child labor, as well as by their husbands. Hmmm, maybe that's what "conservatives" really want? No more education for working-class kids beyond fourth grade or so?
The 1950s they're nostalgic about is the part where anyone who wasn't a white, straight, Christian male was supposed to know their place. That's why they voted for Trump in 2016 and 2024. A woman being president (in the case of Kamala Harris, a woman of color) defies that mindset. That's why they're so scared of AOC, not her politics, just her skin color and her lack of Y chromosomes.
Nobody wants that life anymore, especially not young women. Nobody wants to hear "no, you can't do this" or "no, you can't do that", which is the defining characteristic of conservatism (and often by extension, Christianity).
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!