labels restrict,

Post Reply New Topic

Our languages are slave languages too. Go ahead, break it down: CON-stitution, HYPOCRATIC oath, culture (cult-your). UNDERstand, why not ever interstand or overstand? Under means below, meaning below understanding. Our entire language is set this way, in fact most all languages are. It is a corrupt language, corrupt languages are dangerous because they are slave toungues. With these toungues one can easily justify murder or rape if theyr smoothe enough with their words (but as I and hopefully you know, this doesn't make him right, in the end the languages are used to centralize certain ideas into people's minds through use of subversive propaganda....... So many people do not stop to really see how things work, they do not want to know the truth, and for those at the top that's a good thing, for us it's not.
I think a free language would be very different than any toungue we've spoken here, because you could explain things a lot easier..... But ignorance and moral decay and all the division and cults and cliques would be gone, people would generally be smarter, more willing to look at themselves critically, they'd understand that they should be the only them............. We would not live in as hostile of a world really (but that's not to say a scuffle wouldn't occassionally happen..... However we'd be more likely to come to terms peacefully with a free language)....... Are there not tons of ideas you've had or things you've wanted to say that you have not had any way to explain in words? I run into that a lot actually.

I'm not really crazy about labels myself because they do tend to divide and stereotype, but sometimes a label can be helpful, such as in addressing a problem. Knowing that I have something called Asperger's doesn't exactly make my day, I don't jump out of bed and yell Yippie, I am an Aspy, but on the other hand having this information--this label--has helped me make sense of the issues in my life and how to constructively deal with them. There is a world of difference between being told "you have a perceptual problem" and "you have Aspergers." One is vague, the other is concrete. Sometimes you need that label to get appropriate help.

One of the things that really turns me off of Christianity is the way it is often used to divide up the world between us and them, saved and unsaved, believers and non-believers; and it is not just outsiders versus the church, but often church member against church member, like there is some competition in the "holiness sweepstakes". Some of the most aggressive evangelizers belong to the most self-segregating sects. There is tremendous pressure to conform or be judged. I got tired of that and walked away. I have also experienced prejudice from "the other side of the fence" as well; people would assume that because I attended X church I was sexist, homophobic, you name it. There was one openly gay coworker who steadfastly refused to have anything to do with me; if I needed his assistance on anything, he would just walk away without saying a word. I never did find out the reason for his dislike. It certainly wasn't because of anything I said to him on the subject because we never had a conversation in our lives! But, at the time, I was an active churchgoer and that was enough to damn me in his eyes. And of course I won't even go into the way I have been treated by so-called "normal" people.

So I just don't get into certain conversations at work or elsewhere unless it is a neutral environment. I don't let people know who I am politically, religiously, sexually, or anything else unless it is a need to know situation.

Exactly.

But that "inner world" is dangerous because it is an implanted illusion. And when people are so sub-divided, they become more selfish so you end up with what you have now, where everyone is taught to think and act inside those labels and they stop caring about getting along, they do not want to compromise, they want to dominate. People are fighting for political reward based on religion, gender, race, (all of which also fall under "liberal" or "conservative") etc, without considering the fairness of their position to others..... Rather than seeking the immediate interests of a group, we should be looking at the common good of the whole of our society in the long run, which means compromise, everyone meets in the middle.
We're approaching a police state (to those who have studied history and kept up). They want us divided.... United we'll stand, divided we'll fall.

There are different planes of consciousness, I can believe one thing on one plane, and believe the exact opposite on another plane of consciousness. It's rather hard to really explain.
Take for instance, illegal immigration.... On one plane of consciousness, I realise that according to the system I live in, hundreds of thousands of undocumented and unknown people flooding the borders will be an economic and security hazard to the nation (no matter what color they are, I'm not gonna do the "PC" thing and put them on a pedistal and treat them with kid gloves, and that doesn't make me a racist, it just makes me concerned about my survival before someone else's).
On another plane of consciousness, I realise that the nation state was never anything more than a giant corporation headed by a mother corporation. Money is the fuel to these corporations, and the economic enslaver of society. So the NWO belongs to those at the top, but so does the old world order. It was just a preperatory stage in the plan really.
My personal conclusion being that the best way to gain control of our world from these psychopathic elites is to try and maintain the old world order as best as possible, and slowly phase out their power grids in the system. US and Mexican citizens SHOULD rally together against NAFTA, instead of fighting to let people come in unknown and rob us, and push us right into the plan of beaurocrats and internationalists who wanna enslave us all. But then sometimes I think really the only way to beat this is if everyone stops paying taxes, stops going to work, stops using money, stops voting, stops going to church, stops watching television.

Some things are concrete, it is a concrete fact that doing away with our 2nd amendment will most likely end in government tyranny. This is why they want to take away our gun rights. All tyrants throughout history have disarmed the populace before taking over.... Because a disarmed populace has no means of self defense.
It is a concrete fact that ***according to our current system***, illegal immigration is bad, because it allows hundreds of thousands of people to come in undocumented. Meaning those people COULD be serial killers, rapists, etc. How are you gonna prosecute a criminal that there is no knowledge of existing? How can you regulate an economy when you do not know how many people are living in your country? And then they get free health care while many CITIZENS here can not afford to see a doctor.
Ultimately nation states were created and led by the elites to divide the working class..... But there you are faced with a situation, because now the elites wanna erase our borders and enslave us all under one banner. So maintaining nation states will also maintain the power of our current world domination, but then if we throw away our borders we will be fueling the next stage of the plan, the NWO, which is frighteningly inhumane. As for the language thing, I do think we should invest in a world-wide language, but not any of our currently used slave languages..... Meaning we'd have to strongly analyze our other languages and learn from them in creating a newer language.