techstepgenr8tion wrote:
'Typical' seems like a performance-based evaluation IMO; sometimes they're right about us, sometimes they're wrong. I think things are getting better though, in that people are really starting to evaluate their own functional fixedness on reality. I often think that the one of the greatest gifts outliers bring to society, aside from achievements in the arts and sciences, is their ability to make the broader public reflect back upon itself and its own fundamental assumptions - the net effect of which is more powerful than it may sound.
The autism specialist and Harvard PHD graduate the works with me has always been very accepting and never made me feel abnormal. In fact other then the entry level social service workers I don't find much indignity. I had one worker call me brain damaged for autism, he was yelled at by his boss. It's people that call stimming a stim like one behaviorist said to me that upset me most because it intruded my natural thinking. As if what I didn't even bother thinking of "rocking back and forth" was a bad thing. I just don't care and if what is my normal is abnormal to someone else and they take note and tell me about it to hell with it as well I'll find something wrong with them to and it all ends up mal-productive.
It's important I don't take these ideas of mine to seriously otherwise they become a distraction.