Page 1 of 5 [ 77 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Was the God of the Old Testament cruel?
Yes. 80%  80%  [ 20 ]
No. 20%  20%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 25

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 May 2008, 4:49 pm

As long as we can differentiate strictness from cruelty,
I think it's easy to conclude that the God of the Old Testament
did not have a mean streak -- He simply had very high demands,
reflective of His rightfully high status and authority.
After all, He set up a sacrificial redemption system for my ancestors, the Jews,
giving them full pardon from their sins against Him.

A cruel God would have let every imperfect human (i.e. everyone)
die to face the afterlife as sinners.
Being God, He didn't have to keep them alive.
Being God, He didn't have to lead them to their own land, Israel.
Begin God, He didn't have to make non-conditional convenants with them,
which promised He would never forsake them no matter what they did or didn't do.

And He didn't have to bestow any number of other mercies that He did as given
in the Old Testament, but He did.

1 John 4:8 makes the claim that "Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love."
(That's got to be my favorite verse.)
So, was God love back in the ancient days, too?
I am convinced He was, and that He always will be.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Last edited by Ragtime on 08 May 2008, 4:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

DeanFoley
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2007
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 354
Location: England-Birmingham

08 May 2008, 4:52 pm

I don't even believe in it.



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

08 May 2008, 4:59 pm

To confine the Creator by one sole book is to imprison the Master of all beings. Such an act is blasphemous in my belief. It is near idolatry. There is only One, and He is not confined to one book, nor to one people.

Now to answer the question:



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

08 May 2008, 5:19 pm

oscuria wrote:
To confine the Creator by one sole book is to imprison the Master of all beings. Such an act is blasphemous in my belief. It is near idolatry. There is only One, and He is not confined to one book, nor to one people.

Now to answer the question:


The Bible isn't one sole book and if the Creator chooses a group of people to be separated for Himself, then who in Hell is there able to question Him?



Aalto
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 392
Location: W. Yorks, UK

08 May 2008, 5:20 pm

Though I see the Christian god as just a character in a story, yes, he was "pretty" cruel. Killed a couple more people than the devil I believe.



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

08 May 2008, 5:26 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
oscuria wrote:
To confine the Creator by one sole book is to imprison the Master of all beings. Such an act is blasphemous in my belief. It is near idolatry. There is only One, and He is not confined to one book, nor to one people.

Now to answer the question:


The Bible isn't one sole book and if the Creator chooses a group of people to be separated for Himself, then who in Hell is there able to question Him?


You are not to question. Why would I question the Creator? What could I possibly ask?

The bible not being one sole book, of course not. But it IS one book.


I don't think i answered your question. I'm pretty confused by it.

Try again? :shrug:



Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 May 2008, 5:39 pm

the "man" reminds me of Joseph Stalin



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 May 2008, 6:17 pm

Kilroy wrote:
the "man" reminds me of Joseph Stalin


Remind us: Are you for or against Stalin? On a website like WP, it's important to ask before assuming.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

08 May 2008, 6:18 pm

oscuria wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
oscuria wrote:
To confine the Creator by one sole book is to imprison the Master of all beings. Such an act is blasphemous in my belief. It is near idolatry. There is only One, and He is not confined to one book, nor to one people.

Now to answer the question:


The Bible isn't one sole book and if the Creator chooses a group of people to be separated for Himself, then who in Hell is there able to question Him?


You are not to question. Why would I question the Creator? What could I possibly ask?

The bible not being one sole book, of course not. But it IS one book.


I don't think i answered your question. I'm pretty confused by it.

Try again? :shrug:


Basically if God is the Creator of the universe, then He owns the deeds to the place.



Sargon
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 207
Location: Fairfax, VA

08 May 2008, 6:23 pm

Didn't he nuke a city in the Old Testament (sodom)...and flood the earth while sanctioning the sacrifice/killing of others? Sure, strictness and cruelty are different, but killing so many people would seem to be cruel. The New Testament God seems much nicer though.



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

08 May 2008, 6:24 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

Basically if God is the Creator of the universe, then He owns the deeds to the place.


If you men that whatever happens in this world is by His will, Absolutely.


Sargon wrote:
Didn't he nuke a city in the Old Testament (sodom)...and flood the earth while sanctioning the sacrifice/killing of others? Sure, strictness and cruelty are different, but killing so many people would seem to be cruel. The New Testament God seems much nicer though.


Spoken like a true atheist.



Sargon
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 207
Location: Fairfax, VA

08 May 2008, 6:27 pm

Quote:
Spoken like a true atheist.


Actually, agnostic theist would be more accurate... Anyways, he did (in the Bible at least) do what I described, no?



oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

08 May 2008, 6:30 pm

Sargon wrote:
Quote:
Spoken like a true atheist.


Actually, agnostic theist would be more accurate... Anyways, he did (in the Bible at least) do what I described, no?


I stand corrected. I just hear such quotes from atheists all the time.


I would argue "no" only because the way you posed it made it seem as if He is equal to us; meaning he thinks like us, acts like us, wants like us. That is not the case.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

08 May 2008, 6:36 pm

oscuria wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:

Basically if God is the Creator of the universe, then He owns the deeds to the place.


If you men that whatever happens in this world is by His will, Absolutely.


Not exactly how I was referring to the Ownership of God over His Creation:

If He chooses to reveal Himself, then who is to stop Him? If God has revealed Himself and these events and words have been recorded, then there should be criteria and whatnot to determine what contains the words of God: that is called Canon.



Sargon
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 207
Location: Fairfax, VA

08 May 2008, 6:37 pm

Quote:
I would argue "no" only because the way you posed it made it seem as if He is equal to us; meaning he thinks like us, acts like us, wants like us. That is not the case.


Yes, a supernatural being would probably not think or want like us (and by his natural would be unequal to us). However, the question of the topic is using the human standard of cruelty, not divine standard which we cannot know.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

08 May 2008, 6:41 pm

Sargon wrote:
Quote:
I would argue "no" only because the way you posed it made it seem as if He is equal to us; meaning he thinks like us, acts like us, wants like us. That is not the case.


Yes, a supernatural being would probably not think or want like us (and by his natural would be unequal to us). However, the question of the topic is using the human standard of cruelty, not divine standard which we cannot know.


What standard would that be? What definition so general will be made? I wonder...