Religion vs. Spirituality
The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity
I'd say Starchild' definitions are spot on, actually. Religion, and the belief system attached, was a construct of man. The bible was written by man, for man. IF there is a spirit, guiding us, be it Universal, Earth-bound, or inside us, we don't need man-made teachings or laws to be able to commune with it and be guided. Methinks Ragtimes experiences have been more 'religious' than spiritual, because whne he paraphrases scripture, it's as if he can't tell us what he really thinks, so therefore has to fall back on his crutch. There may well be religious people who are spiritual, and vice-versa, but both are not interconnected. If there truly is one divine presence then, as you say, and he controls it all, then why were so many religions made up to bow down to this deity?
_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!
Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.
You are confusing indoctrination with religion
_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.
The_Chosen_One
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
Location: Looking down on humanity
Both can be considered the same animal, if you like. Spirituality is not bound by rules and dogmas. Nor is there any preconceived ideas on what one must do to commune. Religions are more organised structures who have rules and laws set up for people to live by, mostly in the name of a supreme being. A prime example of religion without spirituality is Scientology; its emmbers worship L Ron Hubbard, but is he God? No, he was just a science-fiction writer whom these people decided was to lead their cult. All the rules are man made, not from some divine source. In a way, Christianity could come under the same path, being as the bible was constructed 1700 years ago out of many texts that may or may not be folklore. The big difference is that even though Christianity is a religion (encompassing many such as Lutheranism, Catholocism, Protestantism), they do BELIEVE in a spiritual connection. Doesn't mean that there definitely is one.
_________________
Pagans are people too, not just victims of a religious cleansing program. Universal harmony for all!!
Karma decides what must happen, and that includes everyone.
We are each arguing semantics in the end, are we not?
My definition of Religion is typically assumed to mean "reunite" or "to bind". Those are the definitions I associate with Religion.
If you consider these to be the proper definition, then you can understand how religion can "breathe" life into you.
(Spiritual means breathing/spirit meaning breath)
_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.
It's the other way round. Not only is religion "a child" of spirituality, but spirituality is just one of the parents of religion, ( most of which involve some/many elements concerned with state social-control ) .
Much more easily since reading Peter Gandy and Timothy Freke, ( some excerpts of their books, "The Jesus Mysteries" etc, are available free online) Robert Price and Earl Doherty, ( website "The Jesus puzzle"), and some of what is technically known as "Higher Criticism" which involves textual analysis of the bible.
These and other sources explain that Jesus was already an established archetype of spiritual traditions long before christianity was invented. Which I can well believe, having had a completely non-christian moment of illumination 16 years ago, in which I directly experienced the unconditional love and willing sacrifice of what I believe was my own personal "Jesus" archetype.
In the case of Christianity I am denouncing what I believe is a fiction pretending to be historical fact. And parables which promote/teach certain attitudes towards those in power. The lord, the master. Introduce beliefs like that in the head, and they do not just apply to accepting the arbitrary decisions of a hypothetical god but also of anyone in a position of power over them. That is how the brain works.
But I do not dismiss/reject "works by great men" out of hand. I am a product of a society ( the Western one) which believes these things, and of parents who although "enlightened" to some extent, have stayed mainly within the christian tradition, so the process has been gradual. It has taken me till now, aged 44, to question the New Testament to this extent. I am very slow.
"All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way..." (Isaiah 53:6)
Independent personal discovery is important. But to always avoid every organized belief system, on the grounds that whatever you discover is automatically superior, is naïve conceit.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 03 Jun 2008, 11:05 am, edited 4 times in total.
Spirituality and Religion to me cannot be separated. So, this argument of Spirituality is better , No, Religion is better is nonsense to me since they are one.
What you are describing is basically devotion. The giving of yourself completely, fully in remembrance and love.
Authority: Scripture, guidance, etc. It makes no sense to pursue knowledge while rejecting it. And I only used "authority" after another member mentioned it.
I already stated that it is acceptable to deny what is untrue (What is True? What is untrue?). In fact it is recommended. The ancient practices were to sacrifice an animal for one's advancement, atonement, etc. They would then return to their corrupted lives. How can such a practice achieve anything if nothing is changed inside the person?
You can deny elements, but how and where can you walk when you blinded yourself? I do not speak for the Gospels as I do not follow them. I only read them to understand its followers. In my belief a Guide is necessary to pursue knowledge. This does not mean you accept everything that is said to you, it just means you require the skills and experience of others. We cannot all know the answers without first humbling ourselves to our Master and to our spiritual guide. In a similar sense, a Christian follows the Bible, followed by the Saints, preachers, et al. to better understand the One they follow. It is the path to acquiring knowledge.
Not accepting wholly what the people say is a common event: How many different sects within a religious belief are there? Yet, they do not deny completely what has been revealed.
_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.
It's not a question of superiority.
It's question of what makes sense, to me. And until I came across the writings of the afore-mentioned ( Gandy, Freke, Doherty, and Price, plus Higher Criticism, etc), the New Testament didn't make much sense. Some of it did; John's "In the beginning was the word... ..." , the vines cut down and "thee shall know them by their fruit", and a few other things, but not most of it.
Most of it didn't feel real, felt contrived, but I denied this for ages, accusing myself of feeble understanding etc. Then I read Gandy and Freke's ideas, which placed Jesus so firmly in the world of myth, and also replaced a few of the missing characters etc, and ... ... boom! I got it, it was amazing. Jesus isn't/never was a real person.
When something helps me to understand, I tend to believe it, until a new puzzle needs a new explanation, which might completely overturn the previous one.
Not superiority, but those things which help me to understand something that is perplexing/alienating me. Interpretations/data/perspectives which help me to make connections.
It's not a question of superiority.
It's question of what makes sense, to me. And until I came across the writings of the afore-mentioned ( Gandy, Freke, Doherty, and Price, plus Higher Criticism, etc), the New Testament didn't make much sense. Some of it did; John's "In the beginning was the word... ..." , the vines cut down and "thee shall know them by their fruit", and a few other things, but not most of it.
Most of it didn't feel real, felt contrived, but I denied this for ages, accusing myself of feeble understanding etc.
Interesting. My dad, who was raised Conservative Jewish, got the exact opposite impression of the New Testament.
He was a professional reporter and writer at the time, and he said that the flow of the writing in the Gospels impressed him as something that seemed written from an eye-witness perspective, in an on-the-go style, as if the writers were moving from event to event to event, while struggling to get them all in just the way they had happened. The brevity of any true reporting style is what he noticed most. There weren't any grandly philosophical pontifications -- it was just the facts. That showed a primary desire to communicate the events that occurred. There was no nagging or lengthy persuading of the reader to believe.
Heh heh, well, I'll agree with "boom!", but I think it was something very different than a realization of the truth.
_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.
Last edited by Ragtime on 03 Jun 2008, 1:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Did I say "better"? I think that they are different, if overlapping.
Do you mean what happened to me 16 years ago? The "unconditional love and willing sacrifice" that I experienced was that of my physical body towards "me".
I had had a very bad headache all afternoon; I had been sick; I was lieing down, and I suddenly seemed to see my body from above, collapsed like a beaten and battered and abused animal. And I thought, "I wouldn't treat an animal like that", and started crying for this poor creature. As I wept my hands started wiping away my tears, and I realised that my body would do anything I asked of it, if at all possible. And I kissed my hands with amazement and gratitude.
The experience changed me. In fact you could say that I experienced a conversion. I drove what few friends I had mad talking about how the mind in our society abuses/denigrates/humiliates/desecrates/ignores/oppresses the body, and how must stop the abuse, must stop polluting the body, etc. I could go on for hours about the effect it had on me. I did at the time.
I became a fanatical follower, in fact obsessively penitent worshipper, of "the body", its needs etc, before achieving a more balanced relationship with it, some years later, after understanding that the body had already sacrificed itself, for the mind, many thousands of years ago, and that its sacrifice had been in vain if I did not then appreciate what the sacrifice had achieved, ( mind, language, etc) , because of feeling guilty, constricted by observance of innumerable little dietary etc rules trying to make it, the body, free and whole like "before".
Last edited by ouinon on 03 Jun 2008, 2:24 pm, edited 6 times in total.
I think that the process is called selection or discernment. Incorporating what feels useful/interesting/illuminating at any given moment. Not blindly accepting everything.
I completely agree, and it is probably why my thinking pretty much ground to a halt while all I had was a Bible and my old books and the TV, before we got the internet connection and I began to find things out again.
The Bible as a whole doesn't do it for me. It isn't a guide to me, it is an instrument of oppression, similar to Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ( as distinct from Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy which does not make judgements about our thoughts, whereas CBT, like Christianity, focusses on changing "negative" content; thoughts as crimes against the laws).
Which master are you talking about?
It was what I needed in order to continue. It was like a ladder. I feel so grateful when this happens, as if people are giving me a hand from their experience of a similar journey.
I don't reject "similar journeys". Where did I "make this clear"?
I reject pre-selected packets of beliefs, which seem to suggest that the population divides up into 5 or 6 separate groups, with no overlap. I think everyone's journey is unique, but there are similar ones; at certain points join or cross the paths of others.
I embrace these writers because they gave me an idea. It felt like a gift too. I was thrilled. Something new/different connected as a result.
If you will explain why you ask this question I might answer it.
Last edited by ouinon on 03 Jun 2008, 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.