Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 


Should people who give up their jobs to look after their children be paid?
Yes, and it has to be a full salary 22%  22%  [ 7 ]
Yes, but no full salary, rather a reduced symbolic salary 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
No 63%  63%  [ 20 ]
Other opinion 16%  16%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 32

ManErg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: No Mans Land

22 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm

Nope.

Like everything else in real life, if you can't afford it, you can't have it. The majority manage to earn enough themselves to bring up children.

If those who can't afford children are paid for parenting, then I want to be paid for something I can't afford. A Ferrari, perhaps. After that, I need to be paid for video gaming, gardening and reading books.

It's not like the world is underpopulated or something.


_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.


ManErg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: No Mans Land

22 Jul 2008, 4:41 pm

<apologies for double post>

Nope.

Like everything else in real life, if you can't afford it, you can't have it. The majority manage to earn enough themselves to bring up children.

If those who can't afford children are paid for parenting, then I want to be paid for something I can't afford. A Ferrari, perhaps. After that, I need to be paid for video gaming, gardening and reading books.

It's not like the world is underpopulated or something.

monty wrote:
Most mothers have gone through labor and delivered. And the whole process of delivering and raising a kid does require work.


I could labor to shift a pile of rocks from the top of my garden to the bottom. Hard work. worthwhile work, but hardly any work is paid. Pay is mostly about employment, not work.


_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

22 Jul 2008, 4:43 pm

for some reason, i have a feeling the people who are supporting this are also the people who don't work for a living.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

22 Jul 2008, 4:44 pm

ManErg wrote:
It's not like the world is underpopulated or something.



with all the resource shortages and what not, you'd think the opposite would be more likely true.



ManErg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Age: 64
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: No Mans Land

22 Jul 2008, 5:50 pm

monty wrote:
When people are on their death bed, will they regret not putting more hours in at work? Or will they regret not spending more time with their loved ones?


Bit of a pointless platitude this one. Will anybody regret not spending more time on WP? Will anybody wish they'd spent more hours on the toilet? Of course not, but you can't stop going.

Personally, I do regret not spending more hours at work in my 20's, as if I had, I could retire 10 years earlier and have a far more valuable house by now.


_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.