Why would someone as reasonable as David Duke be a KKK leade

Page 1 of 3 [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Roman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,298

04 Nov 2005, 11:17 pm

I read an article by David Duke, and I am totally astonished by how reasonable he sounds. After all he has absolutely nothing against blacks, all he wants is to whites to have the same right. There is nothing wrong with black ppl forming clubs for the sake of diversity, why can't whites do the same? There is nothing wrong with black pride, why can't you have white pride?

There is just one thing I don't get, why did he preside over cross burning? Yah, why would somoene as reasonable as David Duke preside over cross burning? Thats totally beyond me.

Relevent article: http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=32



Bec
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,918

05 Nov 2005, 2:34 am

Roman wrote:
I read an article by David Duke, and I am totally astonished by how reasonable he sounds. After all he has absolutely nothing against blacks, all he wants is to whites to have the same right. There is nothing wrong with black ppl forming clubs for the sake of diversity, why can't whites do the same? There is nothing wrong with black pride, why can't you have white pride?

There is just one thing I don't get, why did he preside over cross burning? Yah, why would somoene as reasonable as David Duke preside over cross burning? Thats totally beyond me.

Relevent article: http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=32


The reason that he presides over cross burning is because he is racist. You don't actually believe them when they say all that 'separate, but equal' stuff, do you? The reason they say those sorts of things is to get people like you and me to believe them. They aren't reasonable - they are liars, and they are racists.



vetivert
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,769

05 Nov 2005, 2:52 am

Roman wrote:
There is just one thing I don't get, why did he preside over cross burning? Yah, why would somoene as reasonable as David Duke preside over cross burning? Thats totally beyond me.


easy answer - he isn't reasonable, he's a disgusting racist pig. thankfully, he obviously can't resist showing his true colours.

nice reply, Bec - very nice indeed.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

05 Nov 2005, 3:55 am

Even racists can write good articles. I sometimes wonder which is the worst: "racism" or the systematic destruction of your country and it's peoples' way of life to make way for a bunch of foreigners hell bent on Jihad.

But that's obviously in a European context.



Sean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,505

05 Nov 2005, 4:10 am

If he hadn't mixed himself up with the KKK, he probably would have been President material. :(



Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

05 Nov 2005, 5:45 am

Sean wrote:
If he hadn't mixed himself up with the KKK, he probably would have been President material. :(

That may be true, but he's held the essentially the same views since at least Jr. Highschool.

Of course he promotes racism in the same way that a sleazy used car salesman attempts to sell you a car promoting it as being owned by a sweet little old lady, without telling you that the Sweet little old lady that owned it thought that she was Dale Earnhart (Micheal Schumacher for those of you worlwide), and that she put 170,000 miles on the car before trading it in.

--But then again, the ability to do such a thing makes for good presidential material, doesn't it?



RobertN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 934
Location: Cambridge, UK

05 Nov 2005, 10:38 am

ascan wrote:
Even racists can write good articles. I sometimes wonder which is the worst: "racism" or the systematic destruction of your country and it's peoples' way of life to make way for a bunch of foreigners hell bent on Jihad.

But that's obviously in a European context.


Ascan, go back home to your all-white hole-in-the-ground and leave the vast majority of law-abiding Muslims alone.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

05 Nov 2005, 10:54 am

RobertN wrote:
ascan wrote:
Even racists can write good articles. I sometimes wonder which is the worst: "racism" or the systematic destruction of your country and it's peoples' way of life to make way for a bunch of foreigners hell bent on Jihad.

But that's obviously in a European context.


Ascan, go back home to your all-white hole-in-the-ground and leave the vast majority of law-abiding Muslims alone.


I wish...

http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2005-11-05T141008Z_01_KNE228332_RTRUKOC_0_UK-FRANCE-RIOTS.xml
http://www.channel4.com/news/content/news-storypage.jsp?id=1620760



RobertN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 934
Location: Cambridge, UK

05 Nov 2005, 12:07 pm

The Paris riots are simply the beginning of the Revolution, Ascan. People have had enough of Capitalism. It has nothing to do with race.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

05 Nov 2005, 1:34 pm

RobertN wrote:
The Paris riots are simply the beginning of the Revolution, Ascan. People have had enough of Capitalism. It has nothing to do with race.

No, it's ungrateful Muslim immigrants getting pissy because Europe ain't all it was cracked up to be by the guy on the banana boat!!



Roman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,298

05 Nov 2005, 2:18 pm

Actually David Duke is the one who defends Muslims. He blames 911 on American support of Israel.

http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=13



duncvis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,642
Location: The valleys of green and grey

05 Nov 2005, 2:23 pm

That doesn't make him non-racist Roman - he's just anti-semitic.


_________________
I'm usually smarter than this.

www.last.fm/user/nursethescreams <<my last.fm thingy

FOR THE HORDE!


Roman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,298

05 Nov 2005, 2:30 pm

I agree.... I simply had to mention it because some ppl stereotype racists as universal anti--muslims (which was the context of the last few replies) and that is actually not true becasue a lot of them are anti-semitic instead which makes them pro-muslim.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

05 Nov 2005, 2:54 pm

Roman wrote:
... He blames 911 on American support of Israel.

http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=13

I had noticed.



Sean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,505

05 Nov 2005, 7:17 pm

RobertN wrote:
The Paris riots are simply the beginning of the Revolution, Ascan. People have had enough of Capitalism. It has nothing to do with race.

You seem to be forgetting that France is Socialist. The riots in Paris are being caused by a bunch of terrorist insurgents looking to make Europe into another opresive dump like the ones they came from. It was stupid for the Euroean countries to let them in ins such large numbers to begin with.



Roman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,298

05 Nov 2005, 10:20 pm

Bec wrote:
Roman wrote:
I read an article by David Duke, and I am totally astonished by how reasonable he sounds. After all he has absolutely nothing against blacks, all he wants is to whites to have the same right. There is nothing wrong with black ppl forming clubs for the sake of diversity, why can't whites do the same? There is nothing wrong with black pride, why can't you have white pride?

There is just one thing I don't get, why did he preside over cross burning? Yah, why would somoene as reasonable as David Duke preside over cross burning? Thats totally beyond me.

Relevent article: http://www.davidduke.com/index.php?p=32


The reason that he presides over cross burning is because he is racist. You don't actually believe them when they say all that 'separate, but equal' stuff, do you? The reason they say those sorts of things is to get people like you and me to believe them. They aren't reasonable - they are liars, and they are racists.


He doesn't say "separate but equal". He is NOT saying we aren't allowed to have mixed/multicultural clubs. All he says is that if there is at least one black only club, there has to be at least one white only club. If you are to call white only club "racist" then call black only club racist as well.

In other words he isn't asking for antyhign to be separate but equal. He just points out that there is anti-white prejudice. So the "only" thing he wants is to get rid of anti-white prejudice. Thats why I said he is reasonable.



Last edited by Roman on 06 Nov 2005, 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.