Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Nope.
AG, here's your cue.
Given how long our last argument's been on this matter, I really don't think I feel a need to get up and give another spiel. In any case, all I am going to say is that I think that the assumptions of humanity people hold for a government, and those they hold for man without a government are not consistent with each other.
i'm not completely sure i understand what you mean, but surely you're statement would be a given? humanity under the control of a government compared to a self regulating humanity would surely be two completely different things? i guess the real point of what i mean is that, environmental factors must come into play fairly strongly, no? or am i missing your point somehow?
_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?
Adam Smith