"I don't want to be 'cured' of autism, thanks"
"Discussion of prenatal testing hasn't included the people it plans to eliminate: society disables us more than autism ever could".
"I am not a savant or genius. I'm no good at maths or science, so I don't meet the criteria of the special gifts that might be lost if prenatal testing enabled parents to terminate foetuses deemed likely to develop autism. But I find it disturbing that no one yet seems to have seen fit to seek the opinion of individuals on the autistic spectrum". Anya Ustaszewski, guardian.co.uk:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ism-health
_________________
AUsome Conference -- Autistic-run conference in Ireland
https://konfidentkidz.ie/seo/autism-tra ... onference/
AUTSCAPE -- Autistic-run conference and retreat in the UK
http://www.autscape.org/
I like the article.
But some of those reader's comments make me want to go pull my hair out and bang my head on something. Ugh.
_________________
They leave behind so many shadows. This substance in time forced into life,
still exists because it's here: living in me, living in all the memories, in my life.
Lost inside blank infinity.
Flavors of: Nobody. Slytherin. Autistic.
I'm glad she had the chance to make her views known. And some of the comments show just how little the general public knows about autism.
Just as a tactical note. I think this sentence:
would have worked better if she'd said "conventional" instead of "neuro-typical". I don't think the term neurotypical is particularly helpful out there in the non-autistic world, since most people don't really know what it means..
1st of all I am a Pro-Life person, but im sure even some of the Pro-Choice people out there would be in highest agreement with me that aborting a baby because it is Autistic is plain wrong.
It really irks me that anyone would wanna do a pre-natal test for the purpose of aborting Autistic babies.
"I am not a savant or genius. I'm no good at maths or science, so I don't meet the criteria of the special gifts that might be lost if prenatal testing enabled parents to terminate foetuses deemed likely to develop autism. But I find it disturbing that no one yet seems to have seen fit to seek the opinion of individuals on the autistic spectrum". Anya Ustaszewski, guardian.co.uk:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ism-health
Anya Ustaszewski = right. Anyone who says otherwise (including whoever those mindfu*ks were that were insulting her on her own column) can shut their ignorant pieholes.
_________________
"Yeah, so this one time, I tried playing poker with tarot cards... got a full house, and about four people died." ~ Unknown comedian
Happy New Year from WP's resident fortune-teller! May the cards be ever in your favor.
5264443377776444844
Deinonychus
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 363
Location: United Kingdom
"I am not a savant or genius. I'm no good at maths or science, so I don't meet the criteria of the special gifts that might be lost if prenatal testing enabled parents to terminate foetuses deemed likely to develop autism. But I find it disturbing that no one yet seems to have seen fit to seek the opinion of individuals on the autistic spectrum". Anya Ustaszewski, guardian.co.uk:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ism-health
I read a page of comments on that article, and quite frankly, I was disgusted.
I normally don't read comments on editorials, but prompted by some of the responses here, I took a glance. Now I feel like moving to Britain and becoming their Unabomber.
(Not really, I don't intend to become violent. Even if confronted with one of these jackasses in person, a punch in the mouth is the worst I would do. But seriously, these people piss me off, badly.)
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Prof_Pretorius
Veteran
Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Age: 68
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,520
Location: Hiding in the attic of the Arkham Library
There is no cure. Never has been, never will be. We can however, learn coping skills. We can learn how to be independent, and capable.
_________________
I wake to sleep, and take my waking slow. I feel my fate in what I cannot fear. I learn by going where I have to go. ~Theodore Roethke
And then the whole anti-autism/cure parade distracts us from the real issues.
The goal becomes: <normalcy>, when it should be: <quality of life>.
That's why I'm concerned with them.
Brittany2907
The ultimate storm is eternally on it's
Joined: 9 Jun 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,718
Location: New Zealand
I don't think that's entirely true.
When most people here the word "autism" they don't think of those who are high functioning or those who can at least speak their mind in any way (whether it be speech or via computer). They think of those who can't function without regular specialist support and presume that just because they can't speak, or have an IQ below a certain number that if they talk about aborting foetuses because they have the 'autism gene' or finding a 'cure' they don't have to explain themselves to autistics because "they simply wont understand anyway". Sad, but true. Society revolves around the whole "what they don't know wont hurt them" theory at times (and in this case, more than just at times!). Or I should say, society just 'presumes' everything.
Ok well my rant is over and anyway, I agree with the article.
_________________
I = Vegan!
Animals = Friends.
"I am not a savant or genius. I'm no good at maths or science, so I don't meet the criteria of the special gifts that might be lost if prenatal testing enabled parents to terminate foetuses deemed likely to develop autism. But I find it disturbing that no one yet seems to have seen fit to seek the opinion of individuals on the autistic spectrum". Anya Ustaszewski, guardian.co.uk:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... ism-health
What I found most offensive is that so many people have done no research nor knowingly spent time with those on the spectrum yet would vote in a heartbeat for a measure to eradicate future generations. These are the people who believe we are "normal" people trapped in autistic bodies and therefore we must wish to be freed.
98 percent of down's babies are aborted and most of the children would not be considered severely disabled, and in fact some down's individuals are not MR.
They are also ignoring or unaware of the recent breakthroughs that allow completely nonverbal and previously assumed severely MR people with severe autism to communicate through other means, such as assistive devices. i'm not talking about bogus "facilitated communication" but rather spontaneous communication that reveals superior intellectual skills.
Treatment for the disabling parts, and appreciation for the great characteristics. That's all we need or want, isn't it?
I hope people start to realise that the statement (paraphrased, because a lot of people say it)
is narrow-minded and lacking in insight. But maybe it's cultural bias.
A medical approach means other treatments will likely be too expensive in comparison. So of course many of those who need support and treatment are forced to use treatments that in long-term are more successful and cheaper than other treatments.
I imagine that in other countries, mainly the US, people must be able to pay 1 or several therapies themselves. Or that therapies are very cheap.
Where I live government pays therapies. It's too expensive to pay this for yourself mostly. 13.000 USD each year for a 2 hours a week. 39.000 USD for 6 hours a week. Credit institutes will not help you out with this usually.
Researchers will continue on their quest for a all sorts of treatment, including meds that will suppress or strip people of autistic symptoms. That's how it is for many other disorders as well.
It's claims such as the above that are a real problem, because those in need of help are facing ignorance and told to shut up.
_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett
is narrow-minded and lacking in insight. But maybe it's cultural bias.
A medical approach means other treatments will likely be too expensive in comparison. So of course many of those who need support and treatment are forced to use treatments that in long-term are more successful and cheaper than other treatments.
I imagine that in other countries, mainly the US, people must be able to pay 1 or several therapies themselves. Or that therapies are very cheap.
Where I live government pays therapies. It's too expensive to pay this for yourself mostly. 13.000 USD each year for a 2 hours a week. 39.000 USD for 6 hours a week. Credit institutes will not help you out with this usually.
Researchers will continue on their quest for a all sorts of treatment, including meds that will suppress or strip people of autistic symptoms. That's how it is for many other disorders as well.
It's claims such as the above that are a real problem, because those in need of help are facing ignorance and told to shut up.
Not only that, but it also devalues and dehumanizes us because it institutionalizes, more than ever, the idea that autistics must inherently be inferior to NTs. Besides that, it's genocide. It is a natural human reaction to identify with those similar to oneself and to desire to look after "your own kind." I don't want to be like Lou Arrendale, left as a historical relic, a member of the last autistic generation.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Having Autism |
27 Jul 2026, 3:08 pm |
| Autism/Agoraphobia |
28 Jul 2026, 4:14 pm |
| New here - Sobriety & autism, etc |
27 Jul 2026, 10:40 am |
| Autism influencers on IG, X, TikTok, etc. |
15 Jul 2026, 3:36 am |
