Page 2 of 8 [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
I hate being denied.


Most people would, but if your demand is that of the censorship of people with issues to complain about, why should it not be denied?


I have an issue with people who complain. Don't censor me.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm

JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
I hate being denied.


Most people would, but if your demand is that of the censorship of people with issues to complain about, why should it not be denied?


I have an issue with people who complain. Don't censor me.


Denying your request of censorship is not censoring you but only telling you "no".



peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

17 Jan 2012, 4:40 pm

this is an awful discussion.


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 4:47 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
I hate being denied.


Most people would, but if your demand is that of the censorship of people with issues to complain about, why should it not be denied?


I have an issue with people who complain. Don't censor me.


Denying your request of censorship is not censoring you but only telling you "no".


People who tell people "no" are annoying.



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

17 Jan 2012, 5:07 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
Here is how jerks talk to people who have difficulties:

A Middle English term for a male donkey wrote:
BREAKING NEWS:The Pity Train has just derailed at the intersection of Suck It Up & Move On, and crashed into We All Have Problems, before coming to a complete stop at Get the Heck Over It.Any complaints about how we operate, can be forwarded to 1-800-waa-aaah with Dr.Sniffle Reporting LIVE from Quitchur Bitchin'. If you like this, repost it. If you don't...suck it up cupcake! Life doesn't revolve around you!


Now, my problem with them is that they encourage homicide in others, such as like the Columbine incident and others like it in which kids have been bullied to the point of going postal.
Yep. Having had mental problems myself in the past and had people shout in my face over it, these incidents always make me think, "one of these days, people are going to learn." Hell, at least I was the pleasant kind of head-case who always waved jovially when greeted and took people's advice if it was given. Yeah, I was nuts, but I'm starting to get over it, I think.

Quote:
These jacks who mock others don't help anyone, but indeed can do a lot of hurt. But even if it doesn't lead to quasi-justifiable homicide, it's still wrong. What good does it do to anyone to complain about hearing their complaining? What good does it do to needlessly remind others that "others have problems" and that "life doesn't revolve around you!"? It does no good, it only serves to infuriate with bombastic incendiary nonsense.
Yep. The crazy people are relatively easy to live around if you know how to train them. I could have had Mr. Cho housebroken within a fortnight. On the other hand, what can I do with an insect? An insect buzzes in your ear and sucks out your blood, and sometimes it goes away for a while if you slap it. The kind of person who does nothing but guzzle soda, play stupid games and get drunk and ret*d is nothing more highly evolved than an insect. I cannot stand someone who is determined to be useless.

What use could I have for someone who is so determined to be a self-absorbed cock that the very mention of other people having lives, with details and problems in them, causes them to behave like complete dicks? You cannot just insulate yourself from other people's problems and have them just not exist. Their crap is your crap, like it or not. If the crazies can serve as a repellent against such people, that just makes them useful. If it keeps away those useless jackheads who are dead-set on doing nothing with their lives, we ought to have one posted at every corner.

Quote:
Idiots who speak to others in such a manner only encourage murder and nothing else; they only harm and cause no good whatsoever. It would serve them right to be burned alive. (But, no, I'm not advocating such activity against anyone, but only speaking out against their selfish whinging against people who actually have problems.)
Oh, I agree with you! Including on the part about not really wanting to burn people alive. Burning people alive is not a pleasant way to behave. It's just delightful to think about, occasionally.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 6:14 pm

JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
I hate being denied.


Most people would, but if your demand is that of the censorship of people with issues to complain about, why should it not be denied?


I have an issue with people who complain. Don't censor me.


Denying your request of censorship is not censoring you but only telling you "no".


People who tell people "no" are annoying.

True too, but let's suppose that a person asked two questions: one question asking if something is true and the other if that same is false. Assuming the answer is not time dependent, then "yes" could not be the answer to both questions since it would be both true and false simultaneously and that cannot be. In that case, the answer of "no" would be required as an answer to one or the other Boolean question.



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm

That person would be annoying, too.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 6:17 pm

JWC wrote:
That person would be annoying, too.


Let's suppose a person exists: that person would also be annoying.



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 6:23 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
That person would be annoying, too.


Let's suppose a person exists: that person would also be annoying.


No.


Unless, they complained or told me 'no'. Then, yes.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm

JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
That person would be annoying, too.


Let's suppose a person exists: that person would also be annoying.


No.


Unless, they complained or told me 'no'. Then, yes.


How? Why can't anyone in existence be annoying generally? Why must they only be annoying for you?



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 7:46 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
That person would be annoying, too.


Let's suppose a person exists: that person would also be annoying.


No.


Unless, they complained or told me 'no'. Then, yes.


How? Why can't anyone in existence be annoying generally? Why must they only be annoying for you?


They can annoy others, too. As long as they ask nicely.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 8:22 pm

JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
That person would be annoying, too.


Let's suppose a person exists: that person would also be annoying.


No.


Unless, they complained or told me 'no'. Then, yes.


How? Why can't anyone in existence be annoying generally? Why must they only be annoying for you?


They can annoy others, too. As long as they ask nicely.


No.



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 8:47 pm

No what?



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 8:50 pm

JWC wrote:
No what?


For the sake of saying "no".



JWC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 740
Location: Macondo Wellhead

17 Jan 2012, 8:51 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
No what?


For the sake of saying "no".



I'm sooooooooooooo annoyed right now.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

17 Jan 2012, 8:52 pm

JWC wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
JWC wrote:
No what?


For the sake of saying "no".



I'm sooooooooooooo annoyed right now.


Really?