anna-banana wrote:
hypothetical situation in my case as I don't have nor plan on having kids- but I think I wouldn't. not only because I am a terrible liar and even a 3-year-old could easily see through my BS. I tend to think that if you wouldn't want your kid to believe in gods, fairies, heaven and hell and you'd want them to grow up to be a rational and enlightened human being, there is no reason to make an exception for the guy who rides magical reindeers and brings all of Earth's kids presents on Christmas.
but on the other hand- would that not be a bit too cruel? taking away the "magic" of Christmas from the poor kid? and what about all the kids who'd go to school/kindergarten with your skeptical offspring and could have their naive faith in the guy shattered forever?
for me finding out that there was no Santa was a part of the general trauma of discovering that the grown-ups don't know everything and that they lie. but existence of Santa as such I couldn't care less about, as long as there still were presents
so, would you? why/why not?
i always knew santa was kindova lie, so i played along with it.
ive yet to meet a kid who TRULY believes santa is REAL - in norway. i guess its cultural, and places w more religion/spirituality may push fictional people further.
whenever ive talked about santa as bs at my dads, in front of my sister, their mother looks at me jokingly-angrily, and i have to correct myself as if ive said a bad word. the kids still KNOW its not real.
so... i would probably talk about santa as if hes real, then the kids will see some neighbor in a santa suit, theyll recognize his voice, glasses and wrist-watch (my brother collected these hints) and theyll do their own little researchproject "who is santa!?"
untill they find themselves too old to believe in sillynesses, all by themselves
_________________
''In the world I see - you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center.''