ironpony wrote:
Oh okay. For me it's been a case by case basis. For example, wether the George Floyd incident was race related, I am not sure. I know that the killer knew Floyd from his past, but not sure if his beef with Floyd was race related, but that is just be coming at it from a more centrist point of view.
But if the left is looking at it more from a race point of view, why is that?
From what I can tell, the left look for the "sympathy" from people to gain support, so any inter-racial interaction is seen by them as "racist" if the person of their preferred race doesn't "win" in the exchange.
From the right's point of view, they look at whether there was a problem with the interaction, ignoring the races of the people being involved in it as being irrelevent as to whether the actions taken were "good" or "bad".