Bradleigh wrote:
VegetableMan wrote:
Resisting fascism? Most of these idiots get their asses handed to them. Not very good warriors if you ask me.
If they want to get up in people's faces, maybe they should learn how to fight...take a martial arts course of something.
Or, perhaps, they should do something a bit more constructive, like participating in a circle jerk.
Honestly, Antifa occupies the flip side of the coin with the fascist morons.
I am confused, are you saying that Antifa are poor fighters, and thus should be more trained to be a more effective army or something? That would actually make them the type of terrorist army that they are implied to be? If armed it is probably something like a baseball bat, they are not becoming organized groups that go in with guns and take over government buildings to terrorize them into lifting stay at home sanctions during a pandemic because they think it is all a hoax.
Anti-fascism is not a flip side that is equal to fascism, because fascists actually squirm their way into power and create far reaching impacts that can violently get people killed. Anti fascists are literally up against people who model themselves off of Nazis, who were called fine people by a president that played on fears of minority groups and foreigners, just like Hitler did, and similarly calls all press that does not report things the way he wants the fake news/lying press. Pushing narratives that any protest he does not agree with, especially non-violent, is anti-American, been openly fighting to supress voting, and then act surprised when opposition is violent.
The problem with your understanding is that you are equating things like "there were SOME fine people" being opined as stating that everyone there was described as a "fine person" - The actual quote was limited in scope, whereas it was "reported" (and you posted) that there was no limit on who was covered in the comment...Much like stating there were "SOME people at these protests acting with unlawful intent" would not mean that a person making the statement is saying that everyone protesting is actring with unlawful intent.
Sadly, it seems that people prefer to see what they want in those they disagree with: Rather than look at the actual words used (source material), they rely on the "filtered" version\excerpts\ "news" media opinion pieces which support what they want\hope to see.
It's hard trying to be impartial...both sides don't care to listen to what you say, as it disagrees with what they want to hear.