Lecturer At Yale Event Fantasizes About Murdering Whites

Post Reply New Topic

If she was trying to self-explore, then her talk was mis-titled. Because the title of her talk was referring to white people and she isn't one of them. So this logically means that self-exploration won't fit the title of the talk.

She was "self-exploring" her violent feelings towards white people.

Would you like me to send it to the dungeon?
If you start stirring up drama and attacking people here, I will.

not allowed after the fact.



Now Yale is really looking silly?



https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/06/nyre ... anani.html

Do Psychiatrists have their own meaning of "speaking metaphorically"?



and she is nasty!

What I would like to know is wth Yale was exploring.

In 1977 my Philosophy professor, first day started the course by saying his first thoughts upon seeing a class full of nuble young women was to act on his sexual desires. He used the r-word, not the euphemism. He explained that he doesn’t act upon those desires, it was done to shock the audience to demonstrate philosophy was about values. It did shock his audience, the class audibly and loudly gasped especially the women.

If he said that today and it was recorded as it likely outside of a few mens rights organizations and maybe Tucker Carlson types his explanation that it was an intellectual exercise would fall on deaf ears. His academic career would be over.

Society-wide narcissism, yes. But for the most part its not racial type of narcissism. Its more like everyone being narcissistic to everyone. As far as racism itself goes, yes "some proportion of population" is racist, but then the "other proportion of population" overcompensates for it. Notice that the people at Yale who gave her platform were more likely White. So those White people were willing to give a black person platform to trash Whites, yet they won't give a platform to a White racist to trash blacks. So those White people aren't racist; quite the opposite in fact.

On a different note, I was just wondering: are you saying that in your view US is more racist than Poland? I have no idea whether Poland is racist against blacks. I did, however, hear a lot about Poland being racist against Jews. I guess my own thinking is that having a lot of racism against Jews without having any racism against blacks would be pretty weird, since blacks "stand out from the crowd" more. But of course just the fact that I find it weird doesn't mean that it can't be a mindset of others. So as someone living in Poland, what "is" Polish attitude to blacks and Jews and how does it compare?

Yes but the title of the talk was "The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind”. Since her own mind is not an example of "white mind", that self-exploration does not fit the title.

Imported from England

http://www.melville.org/diCurcio/100.htm

How I view it: the lady's own racial bias attributed problems of mainstream American culture to the dominating race.

Poland and race are... quite a topic.
First, we don't really have the concept of race in a way it's common in English-speaking countries. Poles aren't traditionally endogamous, there have always been mixed marriages across various division lines and we easily welcome assimilating minorities. We usually look at culture, particularily language, not ancestry.
When it comes to Black people, sterotypes differ a lot from American ones. We never had race-segregated slavery nor oversea colonies. A young Black man you encounter in a city center is most likely a student from international exchange. So, social problems associated with Black Americans are largely obsent here. Black people in Poland mainly just look exotic.
When it comes to Jews... it's complicated. Blatant antisemitism is not popular, mostly a domain of some old and crazy conspirationists. Criticism of state of Israel politics is common and sometimes labeled "antisemitism", which I find unfair. However, as with any long and complicated history of centuries of coexistence, there are some unhealed wounds and difficult topics.

Mainstream media doesn't. The 24 hour cable networks don't. If you think CNN is friendly towards the left it's because you haven't watched it.

She might, although I wouldn't consider this as evidence.

How does this lady perpetuate anti-black stereotypes? I'd say assuming she must be black is an admission of one's own biases. That's Dr. Aruna Khilanani, the lecturer in question, btw.

This lady can be speculated to be of many ethnicities, if one didn't know the meaning and language of her last name.

And, yes, the last name could be her "married name."

Yeah thats about right.



I never thought about it as an English-speaking phenomenon. In fact if you look at this map https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wor ... countries/
it looks like its worldwide and, in fact, America is one of the less racist countries.

Although of course they didn't say racist "against whom". So it is possible that looking at the skin color is an English-speaking thing to do while all those other countries are looking at things other than race. But I don't know, I am just speculating.

But it would be strange though. If you want to look at "something" to separate us vs them, wouldn't race be the most obvious thing to look at? Particularly since that is the first thing you know about someone by just looking at them?



That is a bit surprising too. If anything, it is America that is a melting pot of all kinds of countries and cultures. One of my ex-s led me to believe she was pure British (she wasn't: it turned out she had admixtures of Scottish and German) and I found it quite impressive because it is so rare for Americans to be so pure. Most White Americans are a mix of different European countries, not just one. And then of course there is some intermarriage between races too.

On the other hand, with Poland I would assume they would stay a lot more pure due to the simple fact that they have a lot less immigration. I mean I am sure they have "some" immigration, but I always assumed America has a lot more. If you take someone who has no cultural connection to either Poland or the US, they would be more likely to immigrate to the US than to Poland.



That is also interesting. Because Russians define Jews to be an ancestry, while Americans define Jews to be a culture. So it sounds like in Poland they take American view on it rather than Russian view.

Now, I realize that Poles don't want to think of themselves as related to Russians, and they would get easily offended if I say they are. But the fact that something is offensive doesn't make it less true. I mean Estonians would also get very offended if one compares them to Russians, yet they have Russian mindset regardless.

In any case, I wasn't saying Russians are racist against blacks (that is a good question too if they are or aren't). What I was saying is that they view Jews as an ancestry. So it is a bit surprising Poles don't view Jews that way.

As far as Russian attitude towards blacks, from what I read blacks were quite welcome back at the time of USSR, yet right now they get physically attacked when they visit Russia. From what I read, it has to do with the fact that back in USSR days the only blacks that were coming were black students, whereas nowdays there are a lot of blacks who are drug dealers.



But that history would make America "less" racist rather than more racist. From what I seen, Americans are trying to "make up for their past mistakes" by giving special favors to blacks. For example, my mom's friend, who is a math professor at the university, said that there was an incident where there were few hundrid applicants to the professor position and one of them was a black woman. They felt forced to give her the position, regardless of who was more qualified, simply because she was black. As it happened she withdrew her application and that is what allowed them to look at other candidates. Now, something like that won't happen in the country like Poland where they don't have the history of slavery that they want to compensate for. Or at least I assume so?



Yes, that was also true back in Russia during the communist days. But that was because of "iron border" that won't allow foreigners to enter (regardless of their race) unless they had a very good reason to. On the other hand, nowdays in Russia that is no longer the case: there are a lot of black drug dealers coming to Russia, and this is why Russian attitude towards blacks shifted.

But what about Poland? How do they avoid black drug dealers if they don't have iron border or anything like that?



I remember, few years ago, I talked to you about it on a different thread. I shown you this link https://global100.adl.org/map which says that over 40% of Polish population is antisemitic. In your response you actually acknowledged that this is a well done study.

You then went on to say that Polish people are simply more likely to say what they think as compared to English speaking countries where they can think the same things but not say it since its not considered okay. You also said that Poles tend to complain more about their lives in general rather than just this.

However, before you said this, you "did" acknowledge that that study was well done. So then it means that you don't think those views are fringe since thats not what that study shows.



That part is true in other countries too, particularly Europe. To me it seems like if you go to Western Europe, then criticising Israel is politically correct while criticizing Jews isn't. But if you go to Eastern Europe then both become politically correct. But I could be wrong: I am just assuming Eastern Europe is like Russia. But even if I don't make that assumption. On that survey Poland ranks higher on antisemitism than Russia so it would be surprising if Russians could criticize Jews and Poles couldn't.

I, myself (who is an American Jew), believe American people think in terms of both "ancestry" and "culture" when it comes to Jews.

When my mom first came to America and they were calling her Russian, she was correcting them "I am not Russian, I am Jewish". But they were always confused because to them Russian refers to citizenship and Jewish refers to religion. But in Russia both words refer to genetics, which was the ultimate source of confusion.

Although part of it is a language thing. In Russian language there are TWO words for Russian and TWO words for Jewish, and they have different meanings:

Evrey = Someone of Jewish ancestry
Iudey = Someone of Jewish religion
Russkiy = Someone of Russian ancestry
Rossiyanin = Someone of Russian citizenship

But in English there is just one word for each. So if in English there is one word for what in Russian would be two words, then it makes sense that this one word would have multiple meanings, like you said.

But still the fact that Americans got confused when my mom was correcting them in this way shows that they "tend" to view Jew more as a religion. Of course if they are Jewish themselves then its different: American Jews (even the ones who have nothing to do with Russia) do view Jewish thing as an ancestry. But Americans gentiles seem to think of it more as a religion.

Although it leads to another good question. If Americans view Jews as a religion, why would they support Israel? After all there is no "Mormon country" or "Jehovah Wittnesses country". So they "do" have to view Jews as an ancestry in some way. I guess maybe they do so when they talk about Israel but then they totally forget about it when they talk about everyday people they encounter.