Lecturer At Yale Event Fantasizes About Murdering Whites

Post Reply New Topic

The reason, which was contained in an earlier post in this thread (which you removed, presumably to distance your post from the context of the comment you are questioning) was related to the lectures on morals that you provide (and the "high ground" you seek to occupy), and how they reek of hypocracy when compared to the highly prejudiced "anti-white" agenda you provide throughout this (and many other) threads. Those examples were merely provided to demonstrate some of the hypocracy in having blatantly weaponised race with no qualms, insisted there was no "racism" (or, indeed, any problem) in a person stating they wish to shoot "white" people in the head, yet happily judged many people guilty of "racism" throught the site (both members and non-members) given your feigned innocence when it was mentioned earlier in the section I had replied to.

Given you seem unaware of how hypocritical the defence of the lecturer under discussion in this thread is, lets look at some examples of your approach to racial issues: From the "racist" school children (wearing their Trump Nazi starter kit uniforms) waiting for their bus, to the "racist" person warning another that they will call the police and providing some of the information which is specifically listed as being important to take note of, to any "right wing" person automatically being racist, or maybe the claim that: People in colonies such as the US, Australia and Canada can't see that they are simply internalising their parent's prejudices which were inherited from their parents. The ugly attitudes that exists a mere 50 years ago haven't just vanished. They have transformed..

Or how about the failed attempts at referring to a Puerto Rican as "not a person of color (POC)" (Which you subsequently had to retract) in order to be able to claim that "Her refusal to address injuring the boy and the father smacks of white privilege".

Then, as a counter to the pavlovian "white person must be guilty" there's the time when a "non-white" person commited a crime and the subsequent claim that there "seems to be a number of angles" (a courtesy not provided by yourself where a "white" person is involved, and which would result in attacks by yourself on any person for trying to show other angles for a "white" person).

Or we could look at the insistance of people supplying similar actions occurring with victims of a different race to disprove your assertions of racism, yet when presented with a similar situation requiring people of different race in order to justify claims of "racism", you claim this is "irrelevant" to deflect from the question.

Capped off with the weaponising of racial terms aligned with the "white" race to attack members here (as per the post you are querying), maybe you might understand why people see it as hypocritical to read posts where you presume to lecture on "morals".