Jacoby wrote:
SocOfAutism wrote:
I was up SUPER late last night watching all of this and they started to say that the "real" deal was that Fox was planning to hammer him with infidelity questions. He's had some affairs with married ladies or something? I don't know, it all moves too fast for me sometimes. But supposedly he was going to be asked if he was going to apologize to the kids of the marriages he broke up and to the people who suffered from his indiscretions. I don't know why that would bother him, but that's what they said.
*I* kind thought it was looking as thought the media is getting sick of him, or is afraid he's about to win and is trying to take him down because his opponents aren't getting to the hard negative campaigning quickly enough. I saw some Cruz ad where he was using Trump's "I'm all for abortions all the time no matter what" stance from some years ago and saying that people from Iowa are stupid. Other than that I haven't seen any hard hits.
if that is what they were going to ask him then he's more than justified skipping it, they'd never ask those questions to another candidate its ridiculous
I second that. We are having problems with terrorism, possible war, the economy and what not and that's what they want to ask a presidential candidate at a debate? Fox News has really went down the tubes. I don't even watch them anymore. I would trust Anderson Cooper and CNN to run a more serious debate. For a professional journalist, Megyn Kelly made a farce out of the last Fox debate. Iowa is just too important to let her do it again. Thing is, Trump better carry through with not showing up, otherwise, the media will continue to have the upper hand - the media needs to be put in their place.
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.