thinkinginpictures wrote:
When two quantum particles are Entangled, they seem connected to each other.
If a photon, with the spin Up is entangled with another photon, the other photon will have the spin Down.
If you "touch" one of those photons, placed in a very large distance from each other, you seem to instantly touch the other.
Einstein named it "Spookey Action at a Distance".
If any such connection should occur, there should be a signal transmitted from one particle to the other.
But NO information can travel faster than light, by its very definition. Yet, the "connection" seems to happen instantly.
Now, I think I have come up with an even more dangereous conclusion to this question:
The synchronization between these entangled particles, is that there is no entanglement at all!
It is fate. Pre-destination.
You know Fate or Pre-destination. It says that every action has a cause. And every cause has a cause too. Back to the beginning of time.
We are all subject to Fate or Pre-destination, because every move we make, every thought we think, is ultimately caused by a cause caused by other causes, that we cannot control.
Back to the entangled particle (which I believe is not entangled at all):
When you bring a particle into quantum-entanglement state, what you are really doing is to bring it to its ultimate fate.
Meaning that when you touch the other particle, the "entangled" particle will react too, but not because of your touch, but because it was pre-destined to do so, at the
very same moment you did your move.
Your move has absolutely nothing to do with the "entangled" particle. Your move, was pre-destined by fate, and it just happened to be at the same time that the "entangled" photon did its move.
I think where your argument goes a bit astray is in the assertion that what is understood as quantum entanglement is actually an example of predestination. While it is possible that you are correct (i don't think you are, but what do i know?) if you are correct, then quite a few physicists who have spent their lives studying QM are barking up the wrong tree.
The problem with the predestination idea is that it doesn't provide a reasonable explanation of how the events could be predetermined. The goal of physics is to understand the how the univere actually works. Claiming that entanglement is wrong but providing no explanation why your idea should be prefered is exactly what leafplant described at the start; you come in like a four year old claiming you have the answers to a group that long ago may have considered and rejected that idea. You are claiming that most physicists are wrong but you don't seem aware that you haven't even begun to address how your idea could explain how the universe works on a mechanical level.
It seems to me that you are upset that your idea was not accepted uncritically. You seem to want unchallenged acceptance of your ideas, but you do not feel compelled to provide a clear, structured argument as to why your ideas might have any validity. You seem to interpret this as cruelty. But from the perspective of a person who is interested in getting closer to the truth, wouldn't it be cruel to happily let you persue a poorly thought out concept without provideing the challenges to it that might force you to really think out the idea?
If a person believed that they did not need to eat and could survive wholely on sunlight, would it be more cruel to let them persist in their misguided beliefs and let them die of starvation or to make them come face to face with their own misguided beliefs and help them learn from their mistakes so they might survive?
While people very well might be openly ridiculing you for presenting an idea that is not clearly thought out or supported by any evidence, it might be said that they are helping to force you to really refine your ideas. Maybe it is cruel, but it seems they are being cruel to you because you are demanding acceptance of an idea that you haven't made the effort to fully support. Their cruelty might just be a harsh way of guiding you toward better thinking.
_________________
Never let the weeds get higher than the garden,
Always keep a sapphire in your mind.
(Tom Waits "Get Behind the Mule")