Strange Coins and Currency of the World

Page 8 of 30 [ 480 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 30  Next

Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

11 May 2018, 7:49 pm

SaveFerris wrote:
^ Domed ? that is a strange one

Domed indeed:

Image

There are plenty of ancient coins that are scyphate (bowl-shaped), but none that are domed as far as I know.


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

17 May 2018, 9:30 pm

Image


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

09 Jun 2018, 8:12 pm

Here's an interesting series: a whole collection of commemorative medals from the US Mint recognizing the American Indian "code talkers" of WWII. A number of different tribes are represented; here's one:

Image

https://catalog.usmint.gov/medals/code-talkers/


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

09 Jun 2018, 8:42 pm

Image



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

09 Jun 2018, 9:55 pm

EzraS wrote:
Image

Original version (ca. 350 BC):

Image


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


Pillar
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 21 Mar 2018
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 141

10 Jun 2018, 9:22 pm

Bitcoin - not made of metal as you said, Darmok



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

10 Jun 2018, 9:38 pm

Pillar wrote:
Bitcoin - not made of metal as you said, Darmok

Bitcoin. :mrgreen:

Image


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


Pillar
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

Joined: 21 Mar 2018
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 141

10 Jun 2018, 10:09 pm

Darmok wrote:
Pillar wrote:
Bitcoin - not made of metal as you said, Darmok

Bitcoin. :mrgreen:

Image


The only bit coin I ever got my hands on was a chocolate coin



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

10 Jul 2018, 12:56 pm

French UFO coin from 1680. The truth is out there. :D

Image


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


fluffysaurus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,723
Location: England

04 Sep 2018, 2:09 pm

SaveFerris wrote:

Nothing beats an original but I do like the enamel

Image

Why is it George IIII instead of George IV. Have looked it up and this is the double sovereign. The sovereign

has George IV and the half sovereign has George IIII. I will investigate further.



DeepHour
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 89,210
Location: United Kingdom

04 Sep 2018, 5:58 pm

^ That's a George IV Crown (5 Shillings), made of sterling silver (92.5% purity). They were only minted in 1821 and 1822.

Double Sovereigns were only minted in 1823/4/5/6, mostly as proofs, and only with the 'bare head' obverse (the coin illustrated in Save Ferris's post has the 'laurel head'). Earlier sovereigns and half sovereigns were minted with the laurel head, later ones with the bare head. The former tended to have 'Georgius IIII', the latter 'Georgius IV'. Not sure why this was.


Image

Later George IV gold sovereign (1827) with bare head obverse and crowned shield reverse.


_________________
On a mountain range
I'm Doctor Strange


SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 Sep 2018, 12:47 pm

DeepHour wrote:
Not sure why this was.


George IV didn't like it that way , so it was changed in 1824


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


DeepHour
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 89,210
Location: United Kingdom

05 Sep 2018, 1:07 pm

I've read that George IV didn't like the actual portrait on the earlier coins, so it was changed for a more 'dignified' looking one. I think the point in question here though was the change from IIII to IV to denote 'Fourth'. Is there any evidence that old Prinny (as he was known) had any views on that?

By the way, I was a bit shocked to see the 1822 Crown here being offered for sale at £93. It's actually a very poor example, and is worth no more than about £30. :|


_________________
On a mountain range
I'm Doctor Strange


fluffysaurus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Oct 2017
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,723
Location: England

05 Sep 2018, 3:52 pm

Thank you DeepHour, I didn't think it looked gold but I thought that might just be the light, because I could only

find the George slaying the dragon on the double sovereign. I did not look hard enough.

Some sites suggest IIII was used by the Romans more often than IV on coins, and apparently lots of clocks use

IIII; I'd never noticed.



SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 Sep 2018, 3:54 pm

DeepHour wrote:
I've read that George IV didn't like the actual portrait on the earlier coins, so it was changed for a more 'dignified' looking one. I think the point in question here though was the change from IIII to IV to denote 'Fourth'. Is there any evidence that old Prinny (as he was known) had any views on that?

By the way, I was a bit shocked to see the 1822 Crown here being offered for sale at £93. It's actually a very poor example, and is worth no more than about £30. :|


I may have my facts confused but I was pretty sure he was not a fan of "IIII" denoting 4 , my books are in storage but I will look it up when I can.

As for the 1822 Crown , it is not in stock , in my experience items not in stock always have the prices bumped for some reason ( some sort of retailer psychological mind game ? )


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

05 Sep 2018, 4:02 pm

fluffysaurus wrote:
apparently lots of clocks use IIII; I'd never noticed.

I'd always heard that the IIII was used to visually balance the heavy VIII on the opposite side, but that may be entirely a myth.

Image


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!