Should PC people be able to control other people's lives?
This is known as the tyranny of the majority. Just because a majority thinks smoking should be banned is no excuse to take away the minority's rights. If the majority was in favor of re-instituting slavery, would that make it right to do so?
I don't see what is so important about smoking anyway, why defending an habit that is nothing but harmful to one self and to others around in the first place? I would agree 100% with you, if the individual who smokes is the only one affected, but it isn't.
Smoking isn't that important. Freedom is.
The one company I used to work for got rid of a bunch of white workers and hired all black and hispanic workers to replace them as part of their committment to diversity and racial equality. They gave promotions to minorities to avoid being sued for discriminating against them. They fired whites quickly yet were hesitant to ever fire a black worker. The PC laws encourage racism and sexism against the majority.
PC ideas will never work because they aren't based on reality. I read someone that one race was more likely to be turned down for loans than another race. They forget to mention that race had lower credit scores from not paying their bills. Income varies among races but studies have shown the difference is due to IQ. Races with lower than average IQs earn less than average but the same as people of other races who have the same IQ as them. For example, the average black IQ is 85. The average income of blacks is the same as the average income of whites with an IQ of 85. However, white IQ is higher so whites earn more than blacks. The only way to make incomes equal between races is to discriminate against white people so that blacks with IQ of 85 earn the same as whites with an IQ of 105.
The reason I hate political correctness is because they have to be racist and sexist to achieve their goals.
This is known as the tyranny of the majority. Just because a majority thinks smoking should be banned is no excuse to take away the minority's rights. If the majority was in favor of re-instituting slavery, would that make it right to do so?
I don't see what is so important about smoking anyway, why defending an habit that is nothing but harmful to one self and to others around in the first place? I would agree 100% with you, if the individual who smokes is the only one affected, but it isn't.
Smoking isn't that important. Freedom is.
Freedom to breathe without someone polluting your air with foul smoke? Amen to that, brother.
I don't advocate slavery, etc. Don't put words in my mouth, just because your argument is completely wrong and worthless, you put up a strawman? What are you, fourteen? Oh, right. You ARE.
You LOSE. Utterly FAIL. Now, go back to what you're best at - asking what flavor a woman's genitalia is (as the chances you'll ever find out for yourself are somewhere between slim and none.)
I think if someone deliberately does something to themselves, smoking, overeating, etc., they shouldn't get a dime of my tax money if they get sick from it.
PC, on the other hand, tries to keep racist, sexist, homophobic jerkwads from denying people work, shelter, and a decent life, just because they happen to be the wrong sex, color, etc. .
There's a huge difference.
And fails miserably. Let's fight institutionalized racism with...wait for it...institutionalized racism!
Hitler was ELECTED because the Germans thought they were being oppressed by the Jews.
This "huge difference" is just threatening people with death for different reasons.
And when was the last time you had a choice in where your (your???? f*ckin please!) tax money went? You don't get a choice, that's why it's called TAX.
You advocate slavery, theft and murder, based on race, sex and sexual orientation.
You LOSE. Utterly FAIL. Now, go back to what you're best at - asking what flavor a woman's genitalia is (as the chances you'll ever find out for yourself are somewhere between slim and none.)
With that attitude, I'm NEVER going to put anything in your mouth, so wipe that thought away toot sweet.
Saying that you have a right to dictate to me who I hire, what I put in my body, or what I spend my own money on is the very definition of slavery.
I don't enjoy being manipulated through death threats, however indirectly delivered via government.
If you break a law, large men with guns come to your home and take you away to put you in a cage, and if you resist they reserve the right to kill you. They have this power because people like you give it to them.
_________________
A son of fire should be forced to bow to a son of clay?
The PC crowd has gained so many rights, that the world is to accomidate them. They on the other hand wish to forbid others.
The argument has shifted from should smoking be banned in all public places, to health issues, and if smokers are not worthy of your tax dollars, much less their own, neither are people who drink, are overweight, even when they have proven to live shorter lives, so all the politically correct will have their bed ridden fifteen years in a 24/7 nursing home. Now that sounds expensive.
Business has been sued for Gender Discrimination by genders we had no idea existed.
"Are you feeling OK." Has become harassment, suggesting female problems made the person an inferior worker.
When the lawsuits and lawyers, working both sides of the street as usual, cost more than the payroll, the factories went to Mexico.
There I do not have to hire whoever got out of jail that day, or ran through their last discrimination settlement, and I am forbiden from asking more than name and social security number. Age, health, are you pregnant, education, why you weigh 450 pounds, work experance, we have to turn to a private investagator to discover.
Once hired you are stuck with them, fired they sue. They do not mention that they were hired by your competitor. With everyone concentrating on putting business out of business, welcome to globalism.
You can all sell Chinese and Mexican made goods at Walmart. Notice the closed factories, the dead towns, the shrunken tax base? PC got rid of the employers, and Walmart finished off the family owned small business. So collect welfare in the ruins, and shop Walmart.
In mexico the cost of labor is about what we paid in the USA for Social Security, and there are many layers of deadhead office and paper work that do not have to be done, filing reports and payments to States, Counties, about everything and anything the PC crowd put on us. The paperwork costs more than taxes, but now we are free.
Skills that took a hundred years to build up are leaving the country. No one wants to contract jobs here. So your bridges just fall down, for they were under State control, who fed on the National government, who taxed us to pay for it.
We are gone, you can pay for,
The 40,000,000 War Babies who wil retire in the next ten years.
The endless war, for the Haliburton Overloards, they relocated to the Persian Gulf, so they won't be paying any taxes.
The need to rebuild schools, and use them for education, not social indroctrination.
Most of the bridges, the fifty year old Interstate. Water and sewer systems, and of course, your growth industry, the prison system. More under lock and key than Russia or South Africa, in the good old days.
Homeland Security has taken over, and they have to be paid or else Gitmo for you.
On one side the underclass, dopers, thieves, murders, filling cells, courts, and we must not forget feeding the lawyers. Police who keep doubling as crime goes up, and are the bridge to politicians, who hire and hire at Town, City, County, State, and National levels. Government is your growth industry.
Wages are stagnant, minimum wage set in 1992. The dollar is being taxed directly, Canidain dollars are now worth more, and after the price of gold doubled, they quit reporting it, oil at $100 a barrel, $13 when Halliburton took the Presidency, and the true cost of the war is hidden, in keeping the munitions factories running. The real cost comes when they can no longer borrow, and the war stops.
The Religious Right, The Politically Correct, with oil company backing, and the Military/Industrial complex, have been running a 51% Dictatorship. They will make enough to leave, and their allies in the big theft will be left with making the payments on a big house, in a sea of hungry, angry, people.
Come what may you will have none of the earning power, education, and all of the debt.
In all of this you can only talk of smoking in public, and asking what flavor a woman's genitilia is?
The effects of Tetra Ethel Lead in gas was a lot worse than I thought. Several hundred million tons saturated the most densely inhabited places.
The Greeks destroyed themselves by winning wars, having slaves, who were put to mining silver, which is lead/silver/zinc, and refining it, by boiling off the Zinc and Lead, did the same to their cities and lands, and Greek culture died in a generation.
Rome was a bit better, they captured the lead, used it in aquaducts, pottery glazes, and they also when in a hurry, for the army had to be paid, sacked Numidia, and brought the ore to Rome to refine, and then you get Caligula. Soon after Rome was a wasteland.
They had built an empire over five hundred years, they lost it in a few generations.
Now I am watching how Empires fall due to lead again.
Most of the Gold of Rome, and Silver, for they looted the world to make coins, went to China, for silk, spices, and basically labor. It is why there was nothing to tax to pay the army, and why they had to mine more, and more, and produce a lot more lead than silver, till lead was not worth capturing as a product, then they put it in the air.
They indulged themselves in huge houses, and every version of sex, they lived like there was no tomorrow, and truly no one thought of maintaining anything. They just wanted bigger and bigger games, more thrilling than the last.
They marched three Legions into Germany, Vargus, and not one man came back. They had never done more than cross the Rhine, then turn back, now they marched the best of their army into a place they had been defeated for four hundred years.
Lead Madness.
themarsman
Tufted Titmouse
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 37
Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
I wasn't talking about intelligence. I'm saying that IQ (not important what it means) correlates well with income (causation is irrelevant). If you look at IQ and income you might find something like:
IQ 70-80 $10,000/year
IQ 80-90 $20,000/year
IQ 90-100 $30,000/year
and so on
Since IQ is related to income, you have to adjust for IQ to see whether discrimination is really occurring. If the average black with an IQ of 100 earns twice as much as the average white with an IQ of 100, then racial discrimination is probably a problem.
The example I used comes from a scientific study that sought out to determine whether blacks earn less due to racial discrimination. (The study had nothing to due with whether there are genetic racial differences.) It's a fact blacks earn less on average than whites but the reason for it is debatable. Many people assume that racism is a problem because blacks earn less. But to really know, you have to adjust for known variances among races that are correlated with income. Since IQ is correlated with income and IQ varies among races, you logically have to adjust for IQ.
The results of the study were:
Blacks and whites with the same IQ living in the North have the same average income. Therefore, there's no evidence of racial discrimination in the North.
Blacks living in the South with the same IQ as whites earn less. Therefore, racial discrimination against blacks may still be a problem in the South. [Of course, other factors such as education like you mentioned may explain the income difference so it's not necessarily due to racial discrimination]
How can you say that, when in this post, http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf50198-0-15.html, you said "Ideally, smoking should be banned outright."?
Smoking harms children, and I don't think that people have the common sense not to smoke near children. It'd be better for everyone in the long term if smoking was banned.
It's not PC, it's common sense that it should be made illegal. It's disgusting and harms everyone.
You never heard of Prohibition, apparently. They tried to ban booze and that didn't work to well, it only created a black market that benefited The Mob.
The only people I know of who complain about "PC" are the same ones who long for the good old days when wimmen and coloreds knew their proper places.
Bull. I'm a loony left Progressive and I hate PC. PC is not just a left-wing thing either, the "if you hate Bush and don't support the war you hate the troops" meme is a perfect example of right-wing PC.
How can you say that, when in this post, http://www.wrongplanet.net/postxf50198-0-15.html, you said "Ideally, smoking should be banned outright."?
Smoking harms children, and I don't think that people have the common sense not to smoke near children. It'd be better for everyone in the long term if smoking was banned.
It's not PC, it's common sense that it should be made illegal. It's disgusting and harms everyone.
You never heard of Prohibition, apparently. They tried to ban booze and that didn't work to well, it only created a black market that benefited The Mob.
Drugs are banned and we have narcotrafficants. (This however can be taken as favoring either side of the argument)
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
Smoking should be a felony.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Is it easy to control than out of your control with dating? |
Today, 2:05 pm |
| Postapocalypse and people with ASD |
06 Aug 2026, 3:30 pm |
| Are there a lot of crazy people in this world? |
21 Jul 2026, 7:31 am |
| Autistic people, would you prefer to have no developmental o |
07 Aug 2026, 7:34 am |
