Autistic Types clashing

Post Reply New Topic

Where exactly pray tell did I say everyone? Also do you believe it's rational to say all white people are racist? Do you find it rational to say all nts are bias against autistics? Do you find it rational to turn a topic about privilege into a racial debate? Do you find it rational to think that because your family is racist that everyone else is too? Do you find it rational to say that all nts will abuse you? That if someone that doesn't agree with you 100% that are in fact bias against their own kind? Where is the rational thinking when someone thinks nts are privilege because they got something an "aspie" didn't? Etc etc.

Really, get a grip and think before you decide to start this argument with me. Especially since your the one standing on the moral high ground of allowing others to have an opinion. Where is the rationale in that?

Also websters definition of delusion 1 : the act of deluding : the state of being deluded 2 a : something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated b : a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary

I think there is plenty of proof that not all white people are racist, not all nts are bias towards autistics, etc etc. given that some people refused to hear or even attempt to hear any and all evidence to the contrary they have the delusion of thinking those things. So please explain to me how that isn't the case since some members dragged out a racial debate for over 9 pages to prove that nts are bias being the conversation was about privilege if they were being sane unemotional and rational? Why they felt the need to bash anyone who didn't agree with their ideas and why you feel the need to continue with your little crusade?

Btw I didn't attack anyone. I posted once saying I thought that the idea of nt privilege was self serving bias. Then I figured I'd post again with the definition of such. It was after that (page 6) I was attacked for having an opinion that clashed with some individuals. Then I responded and tried to drop it. The other posters refused. You want to promote free expression of ideas then don't condemn me for mine. Else you look like a fool.

Where exactly pray tell did I say everyone? Also do you believe it's rational to say all white people are racist? Do you find it rational to say all nts are bias against autistics? Do you find it rational to turn a topic about privilege into a racial debate? Do you find it rational to think that because your family is racist that everyone else is too? Do you find it rational to say that all nts will abuse you? That if someone that doesn't agree with you 100% that are in fact bias against their own kind? Where is the rational thinking when someone thinks nts are privilege because they got something an "aspie" didn't? Etc etc.

Really, get a grip and think before you decide to start this argument with me. Especially since your the one standing on the moral high ground of allowing others to have an opinion. Where is the rationale in that?

Also websters definition of delusion 1 : the act of deluding : the state of being deluded 2 a : something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated b : a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary

I think there is plenty of proof that not all white people are racist, not all nts are bias towards autistics, etc etc. given that some people refused to hear or even attempt to hear any and all evidence to the contrary they have the delusion of thinking those things. So please explain to me how that isn't the case since some members dragged out a racial debate for over 9 pages to prove that nts are bias being the conversation was about privilege if they were being sane unemotional and rational? Why they felt the need to bash anyone who didn't agree with their ideas and why you feel the need to continue with your little crusade?

Btw I didn't attack anyone. I posted once saying I thought that the idea of nt privilege was self serving bias. Then I figured I'd post again with the definition of such. It was after that (page 6) I was attacked for having an opinion that clashed with some individuals. Then I responded and tried to drop it. The other posters refused. You want to promote free expression of ideas then don't condemn me for mine. Else you look like a fool.

I never condemned you for having an opinion.

Secondly, the points you speak of were rationally argued and supported. The fact that you did not agree with the opposing side does not make the opposing side "delusional."

Not agreeing with Kicker =/= delusional.

We apparently have two different opinions of rational. Cherry picking things to support all or nothing claims hardly counts as rational. I can prove there is a spaghetti monster by cherry picking information off the web too.