LFA people on here creeping me out a bit on here

Page 9 of 12 [ 183 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

Sora
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,906
Location: Europe

31 Aug 2008, 2:06 pm

MFA already exists and it is currently not filled by the people who're considered LFA.

If we'd move those with LFA up to MFA, the MFA to HFA, then most people with Asperger's would probably be completely pushed off the spectrum.

Functioning labels don't apply all that great anyway. Which is part of what many people on this topic tried to say, too.


_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett


KingdomOfRats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,833
Location: f'ton,manchester UK

31 Aug 2008, 2:33 pm

ProtossX wrote:
I do work with severe low functioning autistic's and they aren't able to speak/type or do any kind of communication and ppl have tried everything for them

So i think that there is MFA

Mid-functioning autism which is what we are seeing here

I consider low unable to communicate whatsoever even with machines or help unable to even do anything like that cuz there are autistic like that an what are they? LOwer functioning no thats low function u guys gotta be atleast midrange if ur able to type an talk on here imo

these ppl iom talkin about cant even use a computer at all or buttons or nething ppl im talkin about that ive seen are autistic are just not in good shape right now

so i think we need to re-draft the chart for LFA and add a MFA kind of inbetween HFA an LFA cuz theres some LFA's in here claiming there LFA when Ive seen much lower functioning then that with autism

ProtossX,
judging from the way have spoken about LFA on here-even showing in the title,am find it impossible to believe that also work with autists-everything are writing is extreme ignorance and obvious that have had no experience with LFAs.

Being NV/PTNV/SI is nothing to do with being able to type-speech and language ability are two different things,some LFAs cannot speak or type,some cannot speak but can type-at the complete opposite end,some LFAs cannot be shut up-they will speak all day,there's a lot of difference in LFA-it is not one set level or profound only severity-and all have different needs,if really did work with autists would not need to be told that.


Mage,Sora,
Agreed.


_________________
>severely autistic.
>>the residential autist; http://theresidentialautist.blogspot.co.uk
blogging from the view of an ex institutionalised autism/ID activist now in community care.
>>>help to keep bullying off our community,report it!


lionesss
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Aug 2008
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,305
Location: not anywhere near you

31 Aug 2008, 2:47 pm

Mage wrote:
I don't think you know anything about what "functioning" means in terms of autism. And I don't think you're in any position to be making new rules on who can be called what.

I would advise you, before you offend more people than you already have, to just walk away from this thread and let it die. And the next time you make a new post, maybe have your mom read it over before you hit "submit".



:thumright:


_________________
Come chat about the mystical side and everyday part of life on http://esotericden.proboards.com -The Esoteric Den!! !


creepycrawly36
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 306

31 Aug 2008, 3:20 pm

I would just like to add because of KoR responding, I can't believe with his opinions that somehow he was able to get in the position of working with LFA's. I would definitely be concerned if I had relative that was a LFA under his care



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

31 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm

Mage wrote:
I don't think you know anything about what "functioning" means in terms of autism. And I don't think you're in any position to be making new rules on who can be called what.

I would advise you, before you offend more people than you already have, to just walk away from this thread and let it die. And the next time you make a new post, maybe have your mom read it over before you hit "submit".

I remember having this discussion with you before. Neither do 'experts'. No slight to them, but in most cases nobody knows how well a person function better then the person themselves. There is no real position on functioning, if you scratch under the surface. It is just an arbitrary guideline, passed down erroneously much like the students that are still being taught the glass is a super cooled fluid. The whole premise of Lower and Higher functioning is based on what Henry Goddard pulled out of the air in the early 20th century. Basically this 70 IQ cut off. Of course it fairly obvious to most that IQ isn’t necessarily correlated to how well a person functions. There are people that have very height IQ but can't do much independently.

So there is some logic in what ProtossX is saying, although I would go a step further and not look at functioning in such a one dimensional way.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

31 Aug 2008, 4:35 pm

creepycrawly36 wrote:
I would just like to add because of KoR responding, I can't believe with his opinions that somehow he was able to get in the position of working with LFA's. I would definitely be concerned if I had relative that was a LFA under his care

I doubt that he is in the position of carer, or working with them unsupervised.



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

31 Aug 2008, 5:05 pm

Just would like to comment that the discussion of skills & learning in classic/CDD autistics is quite fascinating. I do not understand why people find it "creepy" except perhaps because it is an unfamiliar and thus unpredictable way of life... If that is so, then the solution is to learn enough about it so that it is no longer unfamiliar.

Functioning labels... ehhh. A rough guide at best, at worst a way to stuff people into tiny, tight little boxes. Not a good way to predict anything about anybody; one "low functioning" guy is probably totally different from any other.

Plus, if you have Asperger's and they say "high functioning", they think you never need help, which sucks when you are trying to get them to understand you really can't do something and would like them to get off their butts and actually help you learn and/or compensate for the deficiency, please...


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


t0
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 726
Location: The 4 Corners of the 4th Dimension

31 Aug 2008, 5:14 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Neither do 'experts'. No slight to them, but in most cases nobody knows how well a person function better then the person themselves.
...
So there is some logic in what ProtossX is saying, although I would go a step further and not look at functioning in such a one dimensional way.


These two statements seem to contradict. If the person can be the only true judge of their level of functioning, ProtossX's diagnoses of those on the forum (and those he spends time with) would be erroneous.

I agree that thinking of the spectrum in one dimension is oversimiplying things. The DSM Criteria for AS shows this in that two persons with AS can have totally different symptoms in Parts A & B.



Callista
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Feb 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,775
Location: Ohio, USA

31 Aug 2008, 5:17 pm

We need a dimension for every autistic person, I think. We're that diverse.


_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com

Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com


Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,980

31 Aug 2008, 8:13 pm

I find that my mind works too fast to have patience for those who cant communicate in some way by means of standard english.
But I do not ridicule them for it, I just dont say anything. But incontinence is freaking GROSS I must say.Thats just WAY Too Much for me to handle-in person.



31 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm

Haliphron wrote:
I find that my mind works too fast to have patience for those who cant communicate in some way by means of standard english.
But I do not ridicule them for it, I just dont say anything. But incontinence is freaking GROSS I must say.Thats just WAY Too Much for me to handle-in person.


So does that mean you are prejudice against them? Does that mean you will not be around with someone who has it?

It's not like you have to change them when they need it, they take care of it themselves and lot of them do hide their dirty ones. I am sure some even throw them away outside in a trash can so their partner or room mates would never have to smell them. You might not even know they have a diaper on in fact because they know how to hide it. My ex was incontinent and no one knew he had one on because it didn't look like he had one on.

The ones who can't change themselves are ones who are in a wheel chair or if they are mentally handicapped.



Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,980

31 Aug 2008, 11:47 pm

Spokane_Girl wrote:
Haliphron wrote:
I find that my mind works too fast to have patience for those who cant communicate in some way by means of standard english.
But I do not ridicule them for it, I just dont say anything. But incontinence is freaking GROSS I must say.Thats just WAY Too Much for me to handle-in person.


So does that mean you are prejudice against them? Does that mean you will not be around with someone who has it?

It's not like you have to change them when they need it, they take care of it themselves and lot of them do hide their dirty ones. I am sure some even throw them away outside in a trash can so their partner or room mates would never have to smell them. You might not even know they have a diaper on in fact because they know how to hide it. My ex was incontinent and no one knew he had one on because it didn't look like he had one on.

The ones who can't change themselves are ones who are in a wheel chair or if they are mentally handicapped.



Well, if it were obvious that they had it, Im afraid that I would find that EXTREMELY distasteful but I wouldnt say anything to them or about them. :sad: I know they can change it but sh1t in particular is so violently revolting to me that someone sh*****g in their diapers whos not a baby is too much for me to take.



ProtossX
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 257
Location: USA, IL.

31 Aug 2008, 11:55 pm

Haliphron wrote:

Well, if it were obvious that they had it, Im afraid that I would find that EXTREMELY distasteful but I wouldnt say anything to them or about them. :sad: I know they can change it but sh1t in particular is so violently revolting to me that someone sh*****g in their diapers whos not a baby is too much for me to take.


Wait but how can they change their diapers after it happens if they can't even use the restroom while its happening?

Wouldn't Incontinent mean that they are unable to tell anything is going on even after its happened?

I just don't understand how you can change yourself after you go to the bathroom, but you can't go to the bathroom and save yourself the trouble of all that other work?



Magique
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 138

01 Sep 2008, 12:04 am

Is there some particular reason why you are so fixated on elimination? Wait a minute...I don't really care. I'd much rather talk to KoR than you any day. I've changed many diapers, baby and adult. It's not that big a deal.



Jaysonlee4
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: Colorado

01 Sep 2008, 12:05 am

ProtossX wrote:
Haliphron wrote:

Well, if it were obvious that they had it, Im afraid that I would find that EXTREMELY distasteful but I wouldnt say anything to them or about them. :sad: I know they can change it but sh1t in particular is so violently revolting to me that someone sh*****g in their diapers whos not a baby is too much for me to take.


Wait but how can they change their diapers after it happens if they can't even use the restroom while its happening?

Wouldn't Incontinent mean that they are unable to tell anything is going on even after its happened?

I just don't understand how you can change yourself after you go to the bathroom, but you can't go to the bathroom and save yourself the trouble of all that other work?


Some people cannot change their diapers at all...others can change wet ones but not messy...some can change them all. no incontinent does not mean you are unable to tell after anything has happened....its not knowing when its happening. after it has happened you know unless you are paralyzed. people that are incontinent cannot go to the bathroom in the toilet because they do not know when they have to go...anymore than you can plan having a meltdown over your sensitivity issues you posted about...what you are saying is like me saying .... Stop having problems with sensitivity issues.....you cant do it can you?


_________________
I found him...I have Jesus in the trunk of my car.

-"It's not that I want to kill Lois...It's just.....:sigh: I want her not to be alive,,,anymore." Stewie Griffin-

NT's are people too...well some of them.


ProtossX
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 257
Location: USA, IL.

01 Sep 2008, 12:11 am

Jaysonlee4 wrote:

Some people cannot change their diapers at all...others can change wet ones but not messy...some can change them all. no incontinent does not mean you are unable to tell after anything has happened....its not knowing when its happening. after it has happened you know unless you are paralyzed. people that are incontinent cannot go to the bathroom in the toilet because they do not know when they have to go...anymore than you can plan having a meltdown over your sensitivity issues you posted about...what you are saying is like me saying .... Stop having problems with sensitivity issues.....you cant do it can you?


Ok i just took a dump I had to use quite a bit of force to push it out of my butt into the toilet

it doesn't just magically fall out of my butt yes SENSORY tells you, you have to go, but you still have to push when its time it doesn't just come out on its own free will like you claim jayson

believe me ive never had poop just come out without having to do some work